2
$\begingroup$

Using the Gaussian (path)-integral

$$ \int \mathcal{D}\eta e^{i\int_{t_i}^{t_f} dt \eta(t) O(t) \eta(t)} = N [\operatorname{det} O(t)]^{-1/2} $$

my book claims that we can compute the following integral as

$$ N e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}S[x_{cl}]}\int \mathcal{D} \eta \exp\left(\frac{i}{2\hbar} \int \int dt_1 dt_2 \eta(t_1)\frac{\delta^2 S[x_{cl}]}{\delta x_{cl}(t_1) \delta x_{cl}(t_2)}\eta(t_2)\right) =\frac{N}{\sqrt{\operatorname{det}\Big(\frac{1}{\hbar} \frac{\delta^2 S[x_{cl}]}{\delta x_{cl}(t_1) \delta x_{cl}(t_2)}}\Big)}e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}S[x_{cl}]}\tag{7.35} $$

using the above identity. What happened with one integration over $t_2$ in applying the formula? Why is this valid?

$\endgroup$
0
2
$\begingroup$

Hint: For a local action functional $S[x]$ the Hessian $ \frac{\delta^2 S[x]}{\delta x(t_1) \delta x(t_2)}$ is proportional to a Dirac delta distribution $\delta(t_1\!-\!t_2)$. See e.g. eq. (7.37) in Ref. 1.

See also this related Phys.SE post.

References:

  1. A. Das, Field Theory: A Path Integral Approach; eq. (7.35).
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.