1
$\begingroup$

Many sources I've seen have alluded to:

An exciton can form when a material absorbs a photon of higher energy than its bandgap

I looked at absorption enhancing effects of excitons, and am aware of the Hydrogenic series for an exciton. It seems to me that the absorption of light energy below the bandgap is due to exciton formation.

Image 1 represents the absorption spectra of a semiconductor at low Temperature (excitons can form)

Image 2 is a schematic representation that I have drawn based on my understanding

My understanding in reference to Direct bandgap semiconductors:

  • The absorption that occurs in the material when the material is supplied with photonic energy less than the bandgap energy may go into creating excitons.
  • These excitons can have various binding energies which depend on n.
  • In reference to Image 1, I take the n = 1 absorption line. Such an exciton will have binding energy equal to Eex1. When I supply the material with a photon of energy equal to ħω = Eg – Eex1 , the material will absorb this photon and this energy will go into creating an exciton that has a quantum number n = 1.
  • As we increase the energy that we supply to the material in the form of photonic energy we can force the material to form excitons with n = 2 (using photon energy of ħω = Eg – Eex2 ), n = 3 (using photon energy of ħω = Eg – Eex3 ) and so on (Image 2).
  • Overall, when you supply specific photonic energies less than the bandgap, you get characteristic absorption in the material at specific energies corresponding to exciton formation. When you supply energy equal to or greater than the bandgap energy you get interband absorption, with electron transfer occurring directly from the valence band to the conduction band, no excitons form at these energies.

I drew Image 2 based on my understanding so it may not be the correct representation.

enter image description here enter image description here

My Question - Is the statement "An exciton can form when a material absorbs a photon of higher energy than its bandgap" hence incorrect? Would a better explanation be -

An exciton can form when a material absorbs a photon of lower energy than its bandgap. This can be seen in image 1 where we get characteristic lines such as n = 1 describing the formation of excitons.

$\endgroup$
1
2
$\begingroup$

I've discussed the nature of exciton a few days ago in response to your other question. So, applying what is said there to what you ask now: Excitons can form when semiconductors are illuminated at sub-gap energies - as the spectra that you have shown demonstrate. They can also form when the photon energy is above the band gap, in which case the electron and the hole have to lose some energy to get to the bound excitonic state (to phonons, via electron-electron collisions, etc.)

So yes, the statement that you are referring to is unprecise. Unfortunately, this rather simple nature of excitons is systematically misrepresented.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! So to clarify, in image 1, after Eg there is slight enhancement with slightly extra absorption on top of the regular DOS absorption and this is due to enhancement from the possibility arising that the electron&hole will lose energy to form a bound state? $\endgroup$ – Aleksejus Pacalovas Oct 20 '20 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ Not quite: as I described in my other answer, the excitons are due to many-body effects, i.e. due to the Coulomb interaction between all the electrons. The dashed line in image one is the parabolic absorption edge predicted by the non-interacting theory. Once the Coulomb interaction is accounted for, its shape changes and the bound states with sub-gap energies appear. Excitons are the sub-gap states - everything else are unbound electron-hole pairs, even if interacting via the Coulomb forces. $\endgroup$ – Roger Vadim Oct 21 '20 at 7:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.