Consider the problem of determining the equations of motion in 2D for a point mass sliding down the quarter unit circle lying in the 3rd quadrant.
That is, at $t=0$, it is at position $(-1,0)$, and we wish to determine its position $x(t)$ for $t>0$, as it slides to $(0,-1)$.
Let $\alpha(t)$ denote the angle between the tangent line to the quarter circle at position $x(t)$, and the x-axis, so that essentially $\alpha(0) = \frac{\pi}{2}$.
Then $x(t) = -(\sin \alpha(t), \cos \alpha(t))$.
Moreover, the instantaneous force acting on the particle is
$F = m \ddot{x} = mg \sin \alpha (\cos \alpha, -\sin \alpha)$.
Edit: The calculations from here onwards are not correct, as pointed out in the answers, although coincidentally the end result and the plot are. See my answer below.
Differentiating $x$ twice and equating it to $\frac{1}{m} F$ gives
$\begin{pmatrix}\sin \alpha & -\cos \alpha \\ \cos \alpha & \sin \alpha\end{pmatrix} % \begin{pmatrix} \dot{\alpha} \\ \ddot{\alpha} \end{pmatrix} = g \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \cos \alpha \\ -\sin^2 \alpha \end{pmatrix} $
so that by assuming $\alpha$ is never exactly $\frac{\pi}{2}$, hence being able to invert the matrix, after some cancellations we get
$\begin{pmatrix} \dot{\alpha} \\ \ddot{\alpha} \end{pmatrix} % = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ -g \sin \alpha \end{pmatrix}$ .
Now solving $\ddot{\alpha} = -g \sin \alpha$ alone using Euler integration with initial conditions $\alpha(0) = \frac{\pi}{2}$ and $\dot{\alpha}(0) = 0$, and then plotting $x(t)$, produces something that looks reasonable: the spacings increase as the particle slides down and gains speed.
However, $\dot{\alpha} = 0$ forces $\alpha$ to be constant, and $\ddot{\alpha}$ to be zero, constraining away the expected trajectories.
Why does this problem occur with this solution?