2
$\begingroup$

I was looking at some calculations of the deflection of light by the sun. However, there is something that I cannot understand. They usually express a relation $$r = \dfrac{p}{1+e\cos(\theta)} \qquad (\star) $$ as if it were massive, knowing that nothing in this expression depends on the mass (but it depends on the massive energy $\epsilon = E/m$).

Here's the "energy" conservation for a massless particle (it has the dimension of energy over a mass) : $$ \epsilon = \frac 1 2 c^2 - \frac \kappa r $$ with $\kappa = GM_s$, where $M_s$ denotes the sun's mass.

I believe that in this paper1, they assume that $(\star)$ holds:

A light ray, from a distant star, under the Sun’s gravitational force field describes the usual central force hyperbolic orbit.

So here's my problem: since $c$ is a constant, how can $\epsilon$ be a constant knowing that $r$ is not?


Warning: I choose to right as $e$ the eccentricity and $\epsilon$ the quantity conserved through the movement. However, in the paper I linked above, they denote $\epsilon$ the eccentricity!


1 D. S.L. Soares, "Newtonian gravitational deflection of light revisited", arXiv:physics/0508030.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

In these calculations, the light is modeled as an ordinary particle whose speed happens to be $c$ either at infinity or at the point of closest approach. The speed isn't (and can't be) constant on the whole orbit. The paper that you linked sets the speed to $c$ at closest approach (see the text after equations 5 and 7).

There's really no adequate Newtonian theory of light, so the concept of computing the Newtonian gravitational deflection of light doesn't make a lot of sense. The alternatives to treating light as an ordinary particle are treating it as a particle moving at infinite speed (which would lead to a prediction of no deflection) or as a wave in a luminiferous aether (in which case I suppose the prediction would depend on how gravity affects the aether).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

As I vaguely remember, Newtonian gravity does not have any affect on light. Einstein's General Relativity was the first prediction about gravity bending light, and this was confirmed a few years later by seeing the effect in a telescope during a full solar eclipse.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.