3
$\begingroup$

We can argue that internal forces on a body add up to zero by saying that forces are created in pairs (third law) inside the system and hence the net sum must be zero. Similarly we by the third law of rotational dynamics, we should be able to argue the same for rotations.

However, it is written in the book of Kleppmer and Kolenkow: introduction to mechanics, that it is not possible to prove that internal torques sum to zero using newton's laws and we must accept it as an experimental fact. Why exactly does my previously stated argument fail?

Thanks to @Rosnaik I figured out my argument was indeed correct. However, I do wish to know what Kleppner was trying to say here.


Reference page-260, under dynamics and fixed axis rotation

$\endgroup$
1

3 Answers 3

8
$\begingroup$

Suppose you have two particles 1 and 2 interacting with each other. Force on 1 by 2 is $F_{12}$ and force on 2 by 1 is $F_{21}$. From Newton's third law it follows that $F_{12} = - F_{21}$. Now let's calculate the torque of this two particle system. $$\tau_{internal} = \mathbf{r_1} \times \mathbf{F_{12}} + \mathbf{r_2} \times \mathbf{F_{21}}$$ $$ = (\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}) \times \mathbf{F_{12}}$$ When does this torque vanish? It vanishes when $\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_2}$ is parallel to $\mathbf{F_{12}}$. In other words, the net internal torque in a system is zero only when the internal forces are central, i.e., if they point along the line connecting the two particles.

Remember Newton's laws do not require this. Newton's third law only says the forces have to be equal and opposite. It does not say that they also have point along the connecting vector. That depends on the nature of forces. You have to do some extra experiments to find that out. If, experimentally you find that there are non central forces between particles, then internal torque cannot be zero.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Could you give suggestions for further reading/ where you got this from ? $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ And this answer contradicts with the other answer which is said.. hmm EDIT: that the force is along the line is assumed in mit video! Could you give an example where force of two interacting particle is not along the line joining two particles? $\endgroup$
    – Brian
    Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 10:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Magnetic forces is one such example. I'm too lazy to go into the details but I'm pretty sure Kleppner discusses this in considerable detail in the next chapter $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 11:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ok I just checked and Kleppner doesn't go into the details, he just mentions electromagnetic interaction as an example. Take a look at section 8.5 of Kleppner for a deeper discussion of what i said $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 11:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Newton's laws do not require this [...] You have to do experiments to find that out" – as currently written, I think this is misleading since it suggests that angular momentum conservation is more of an empirical question than linear momentum conservation. The reality is Newton just happened to write down one of the conservation laws and not the other. They're equally in need of experimental validation. $\endgroup$
    – benrg
    Commented Oct 7, 2020 at 16:22
1
$\begingroup$

This is just a small addition to the other answers...

Like the other answers state, just from Newton's 3 laws, it is impossible to predict that net internal torque is zero.

But it is fair enough to assume that the interactions between the particles are electrostatic. Since electrostatic force is a central force, we can conclude that the net internal torque is zero.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If the sum of the internal torques was not zero, then the system could undergo spontaneous angular acceleration in violation of conservation of angular momentum (and energy).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.