Find acceleration in the following system :
This was a solved example in the book (*) which had steps as follows:
$$ W_1 - T_1 = M_1 a $$ $$ W_2 - T_2 = M_2 a (**)$$ $$ T_1 R - T_2 R = I \alpha $$ $$ T_1 - T_2 = I \frac{ \alpha}{R}$$
Now, combining equations,
$$ W_1 - W_2 - \frac{I\alpha}{R^2} = (M_1 +M_2) a$$
Using the fact that $ I = \frac{M_p R^2}{2}$ since pulley is a disc and plugging in weights,
$$ a= \frac{(M_1 - M_2) g}{ M_1 +M_2 + \frac{M_p}{2} }$$
What makes this solution hard for me to think about is that the rotation of pulley is dependent on it having mass, that is, if we took that mass of the disc tends to zero, then we would find that there is no rotation. So, do you need mass to rotate? I'm pretty sure you don't.. which I find weird or is this saying something about the physical world, that is, do you need mass to feel torques and forces unlike where particles can just move for the sake of it in mathematics?
References:
*: Kleppner and Kolenkow's , introduction to mechanics, page-254
**: due to constraint acceleration of both blocks are equal.
Notes for answers/future answers:
Why is infinite angular acceleration unrealistic? I'm pretty sure you can make a light object rotate fast if you apply a small torque.
Is mass the most fundamental property through which object can interact with surroundings?
As we reduce the mass of pulley, it is necessary that it should become unable to rotate but why?
As a counterpoint to the previous one, $ \sum \tau = I \alpha$ and rearranging: $ \frac{ \sum \tau}{I} = \alpha$ so if we made the mass small then moment of inertia would go down to zero. This would make the angular acceleration blow up, however some say that it should still be zero.. which I can't understand.