TLDR: The question: Does it make sense to calculate scattering amplitudes using an off-shell renormalization scheme?

I expand a bit by using a theory of a single self interacting massive scalar. I consider both the bare and renormalized objects by subscripts $0$ or $R$. We have $\phi_0 = \sqrt{Z_{\phi}} \phi_R, m_0 = Z_m m_R$.

The connected bare (renormalized) momentum space Greens function reads \begin{align*} G_{c,0(R)}^{(n,m)}(p_1,...,p_n;p_1',...,p_m') = \prod_{i=1}^n\int d^dx_i~e^{-ip_i x_i} \prod_{j=1}^m \int d^dy_j~e^{ip'_j y_j} \langle\Omega| T \phi_{0(R)}(x_1)...\phi_{0(R)}(x_n) \phi_{0(R)}(y_1)...\phi_{0(R)}(y_m) |\Omega \rangle_c, \end{align*} where the subscript $c$ means that we take only connected diagrams. The full bare (renormalized) propagator $i\Pi_{0(R)}(p^2)$ is defined by \begin{align*} G_{c,0(R)}^{(1,1)}(p;-p') = (2\pi)^d \delta^{(d)}(p-p') i\Pi_{0(R)}(p^2). \end{align*} We have \begin{align*} i\Pi_{0(R)}(p^2) = \frac{i}{p^2 - m_{0(R)}^2 - \Sigma_{0(R)}(p^2) + i0} = \frac{i\mathcal{R}_{0(R)}}{p^2 - m_{ph}^2} + \text{terms non-singular as }p^2 \rightarrow m_{ph}^2, \end{align*} where $\Sigma_{0(R)}(p^2)$ is the sum over the all 1PI diagrams with two external legs, with the two external free propagators $\frac{i}{p^2 - m_{0(R)}^2 + i0}$ factored out. The pole mass $m_{ph}$ is defined to be the solution of \begin{align*} m_{ph}^2 = m_{0(R)}^2 + \Sigma_{0(R)}(m_{ph}^2) \end{align*} and the residue at this pole is given by \begin{align*} \mathcal{R}_{0(R)} = \frac{1}{1-\Sigma_{0(R)}'(m_{ph}^2)}. \end{align*} The LSZ formula reads \begin{align*} {}_H\langle p_1',...,p_m'| i\mathcal{T} |p_1,...,p_n\rangle_H &= \lim_{p_1^2,...,p_n^2,p_1'^2,...,p_m'^2 \rightarrow m_{ph}^2} \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{p_i^2-m_{ph}^2}{i \sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0}}\prod_{j=1}^m \frac{p_j'^2-m_{ph}^2}{i \sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0}} G_{c,0}^{(n,m)}(p_1,...,p_n;p_1',...,p_m') \\ &= \lim_{p_1^2,...,p_n^2,p_1'^2,...,p_m'^2 \rightarrow m_{ph}^2} \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{p_i^2-m_{ph}^2}{i \sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0/Z_{\phi}}}\prod_{j=1}^m \frac{p_j'^2-m_{ph}^2}{i \sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0/Z_{\phi}}} G_{c,R}^{(n,m)}(p_1,...,p_n;p_1',...,p_m') \\ &= \lim_{p_1^2,...,p_n^2,p_1'^2,...,p_m'^2 \rightarrow m_{ph}^2} \Big{(} \frac{\mathcal{R}_R}{\sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0/Z_{\phi}}} \Big{)}^{n+m} G_{c,amp,R}^{(n,m)}(p_1,...,p_n;p_1',...,p_m'), \end{align*} where $G_{c,amp,R}^{(n,m)}$ is the amputated Greens function.
Now an important assumption is that mass $m_{ph}$ is simultaneously the physical mass of the particles in the asymptotic state on the LHS of the LSZ formula and corresponds to the pole of the full propagator at $p^2 = m_{ph}^2$.
When using an on-shell scheme, where $m_R = m_{ph}$ and $\mathcal{R}_0 = Z_{\phi}, \mathcal{R}_R = 1$ everything is fine. The $\mathcal{T}$ matrix element is just the amputated Greens function with on-shell external particles.
However for a general off-shell scheme this is not the case. Moreover, in addition to the awkward factor $\Big{(} \frac{\mathcal{R}_R}{\sqrt{\mathcal{R}_0/Z_{\phi}}} \Big{)}^{n+m}$, the masses appearing in the propagators for a given diagram is $m_R$ while the $p_i^2 = p_j'^2 = m_{ph}^2 \neq m_R^2$.

The last line from in the above equation is clearly impractical for calculations. Am I therefore right to assume that calculating scattering amplitudes using an off-shell renormalization scheme is non-sensible?

However I do often see something like scattering amplitudes in MS scheme, how would one define then this amplitude or modify the LSZ prescription?



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.