1
$\begingroup$

I need to calculate the components of the radiative flux tensor and the pressure tensor, but I am having a little trouble figuring out what the integral should be. The flux is defined as

$$F_v = 4{\pi}H_v$$ where $$H_v = 1/4{\pi} \int I_v {\hat k} d{\Omega}$$

and

$${\hat k_i} = (sin{\theta}cos{\phi}, sin{\theta}sin{\phi}, cos{\theta})$$

I know I need to integrate over the solid angle, and so the limits of integration are 0 to 2pi but I need to determine the components for an observer distance d away. Do I need a second integral that involves d in some way, or do I just integrate over the solid angle?

The same question holds for the pressure tensor, which is defined similarly, except

$$K_v = 1/4{\pi}\int I_v {\hat k_i}{\hat k_j}d{\Omega}$$

I'm pretty sure I need to something like

$$1/4{\pi} \int_{0}^{2{\pi}} d{\phi} \int {\hat k_i}d{\theta}$$

but I don't know what the limits of integration are for an observer distance d from the center of the sphere.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am not completely sure what you are looking for since your question seems to be twofold, 1) looking for the component expressions of the (monochromatic) radiation flux tensor $\left( F_\nu \right)^{i} = F_\nu^{i}$ and the component expression of the radiation pressure tensor $\left(K_\nu\right)^{ij} = K_\nu^{ij}$ as well as 2) a way to determine those quantities for an observer at a distance $d$ away from the radiation source, right? I think for the second part you probably need to know whether the source of interest is point-like or extended to make reasonable simplifications. $\endgroup$ – Diazenylium Sep 8 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for answering. Yea, I think I need both parts, since presumably the answer the first informs the answer to the second. The source is a uniformly bright sphere, which can be treated as point-like, I think. I don't have any other information if we are to treat it as an extended system. $\endgroup$ – philosophytophysics Sep 8 at 21:41
1
$\begingroup$

First I start with the component formulation of the (monochromatic) radiative flux tensor $\mathbf{F_\nu}$, i.e. $\left( \mathbf{F_\nu} \right)^{i} \equiv F_\nu^{\;i}$,

$$ F_\nu^{\;i} := \oint_\Omega I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^{i} \, d\Omega \quad. $$

If we express the direction vector $\mathbf{k}$ in cartesian coordiantes, i.e. $\mathbf{k} = (k^i)_{i \in \{x,y,z\}} = (k^x, k^y, k^z)$ we can re-write1 the radiation flux from above, we get

$$ \left( F_\nu^{\;x},\, F_\nu^{\;y}, \, F_\nu^{\;z} \right) = \left( \oint_\Omega I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^{x} \, d\Omega, \, \oint_\Omega I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^{y} \, d\Omega, \, \oint_\Omega I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^{z} \, d\Omega \right) \quad,$$ with

$$ \mathbf{k} = \left( sin (\theta) cos(\phi),\, sin (\theta) sin(\phi),\, cos(\theta) \right) \quad. $$

A useful resource for orientation about the definition of the solid angle $\Omega$ and how to apply certain ranges of integration is the nrao.edu website which also reminds that the solid angle increment $d\Omega$ in spherical coordiantes is given by $d\Omega = sin\theta \, d\theta \, d\phi$. Furthermore, as you asked as second part of your question, how to tackle ways to take a certain distance $d$ from the source of emission to the observer into account, the solid angle $\Omega$ needs to be changed accordingly based on how large the detector will be, see also the nrao.edu website and slide no. 5 here.

For the (monochromatic) pressure tensor $\mathbf{P_\nu}$ you need to be careful not to confuse the former with the $K$ integral or angularmoment of order two $\mathbf{K_\nu}$. However, both of which are directly related through,

$$ P_\nu^{\; ij} \equiv \frac{4\pi}{c_0} K_\nu^{\; ij} = \frac{1}{c_0} \oint I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^i \, k^j \, d\Omega \quad. $$


Addendum: (more background info, in case you need it)

For any star we know that the effective temperature $T_{\text{eff}}$ of the radiation source depends on the total, actual radiation flux, integrated over all frequences if we can assume the star's spectrum to be reasonably close (or identical) to a black body,

$$ F_{tot.} = \int_{0}^{\infty}d\nu \, \int_\Omega I_\nu(\mathbf{k}) \, k^{i} \, d\Omega \equiv \sigma \, T_{\text{eff}} \overset{!}{=} \frac{L}{4 \pi r^2} \quad, $$

which finally links the flux density to the luminosity of the source.

Although the source intensity $I_\nu$ is independent of the distance $d$ between the source and the observer, the flux density is not independent of source distance, and scales due to the solid angle $\Omega$ with

$$ \int_\Omega \ldots d\Omega \propto \frac{1}{d^2}, $$

see also the nrao.edu site.

I hope this synopsis helps as a starting point.


Footnotes & References:

1 Hubeny I. & Mihalas, D.: Theory of Stellar Atmospheres. Princeton University Press, 2015, p. 72ff.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, I had a hard time to go into more specific details about how to compute the integrals and how to set the $d\Omega$ properly, since I do not know much about your problem at hand from what you have provided in your question. But I am happy to amend and revamp my answer based on your feedback. $\endgroup$ – Diazenylium Sep 9 at 21:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! This is exactly what I needed. I can apply it to my problem, which is fairly straightforward with this information. The website you cited is also great, so thanks again. $\endgroup$ – philosophytophysics Sep 9 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome @philosophytophysics! If my answer was helpful or informative for your question, you are free to upvote the answer or any answer that comes along in the future. :) $\endgroup$ – Diazenylium Sep 10 at 13:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.