Using $M87^*$ data from EHT observation (mass, temp of the surrounding accreting disk) and approximating area of EH by euclidean geometry $4\pi r^2)$, error comes around of order one or two.
One gets following result: $T_{M87^*}\approx0K$ and since surrounding temperature is $6\times10^9K$ therefore by Boltzmann formulae of blackbody radiation, $P_{rad}\approx7.3\times10^{31}W/m^2$, Area of EH $\approx4.7\times10^{27}$ therefore luminosity $L_{haw}\approx 3.4\times10^{66}\mathrm{ergs}/s$ which is ginormously large compared to X-ray luminosity $L_{0.5-7\mathrm{keV}}\approx6\times10^{43}$ which is only for a small range of energy of photon still there is a difference of order $23$ so it should make the Hawking radiation detectable.
Two things I am dubious of are
- The accretion happens in a planar region so the BH is not completely surrounded by temperature gradient of $10^9K$.
- The luminosity of Hawking radiation is calculated by including all the wavelengths of the spectrum whereas the second quantity is for only a selected portion of spectrum.
Edit: By $T_{M87^*}$ I meant the Hawking temperature of the black hole which is, neglecting the spin contribution $\frac{1}{4GM}\approx0$ and this black hole behaves like a black body of temp $\frac{1}{4GM}$ placed in the surrounding of the accreting disk.