1
$\begingroup$

When considering a one-dimensional monatomic chain of atoms (identical masses $m$ & spring constant $\kappa$), one finds the following dispersion: $$ \omega(k) = \sqrt\frac{\kappa}{m}\cdot\left|\sin\left(\frac{ka}{2}\right)\right|\, ,$$

which is $\frac{2\mathrm{\pi}}{a}$-periodic. So wavewectors higher than $\mathrm{\pi}/a$ do not provide new physical behaviour.

However, when computing the phase velocity, one finds: $$ v_p = \frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{1}{k}\sqrt\frac{\kappa}{m}\cdot\left|\sin\left(\frac{ka}{2}\right)\right|\, .$$ This means that the phase velocity goes like a sinc, which is not periodic; wavevectors outside the first Brioullin zone yield a much lower phase velocity.

How is this possible? Is there a good reason to consider only the first Brioullin zone for the phase velocity? Or are there other errors my calculation?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you care about phase velocity? Group velocity is much more important and meaningful $\endgroup$
    – FGSUZ
    Aug 21, 2020 at 0:41

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The phase velocity is kind of meaningless outside the first Brillouin zone. The phase velocity is the speed that the "crest" of a wave travels, but outside the first Brillouin zone, the wavelength is less than the spacing between atoms, so there aren't really crests; most "crests" occur in the gaps between the atoms where there is nothing to displace, so the crests are kind of mathematical artifacts.

While you can define a continuous function for the displacement of the atoms from their equilibrium position $u\left(x, t\right)$ for the wave, that doesn't mean that the wave is really continuous; the wave only has a meaningful displacement at the $x$ positions where there are atoms. So, some of the intuition coming from waves in a continuous medium doesn't really apply.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. I had a hard time thinking about increasingly small $v_p$ for large values of $k$. But in this simple case, wavevectors should be truncated to the first BZ in the first place. So maybe one should redefine $v_p$ to be $\omega / (k\,\mathrm{mod}\, (\pi/a))$. This yields a much more sensible graph. $\endgroup$ Aug 21, 2020 at 15:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.