1
$\begingroup$

I am reading Wayne Hu's short lecture on cosmology mathematical infrastructure (https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0402060), and have several questions.

Some background for us lazy people that don't want to open the link:

Wayne basically shows us how to quickly count the number of degrees of freedom, using a couple of methods:

  1. A 4x4 symmetric matrix (i.e. the space-time metric, and stress-energy tensor in this case) has $\frac{4\cdot 5}{2}=10$ degrees of freedom.
  2. These degrees of freedom can be decomposed into Scalar, Vector and Tensor (SVT) components.
  3. Wayne decomposes said DOF thus: $$g^{00}=-a^{-2}(1-2A);\;A\text{ is a scalar}\\ g^{0i}=-a^{-2}B^{i};\; B^i \text{ a vector shift} \\ g^{ij}=a^{-2}\left(\gamma^{ij}-2H_{L}\gamma^{ij}-2H_{T}^{ij}\right);\;$$ where $H_L$ is a scalar perturbation to the spatial curvature and $H_T^{ij}$ is a trace-free distortion to spatial metric.

Similarly, the $T^{\mu}_{\nu}$ breakdown is: $$ T^0_0 = -\rho -\delta\rho\\ T^0_i=(\rho+p)(v_i+B_i)\\ T^i_0=-(\rho+p)v^i\\ T^i_j=(p+\delta p)\delta^i_j +p\Pi^i_j$$

So far so good. However, on page 7 near the bottom, he counts the DOF thusly: 20 variables, -17 (Homogenous and Isotropic), -2 Einstein equations, -1 conservation equations, +1 Bianchi identity = 1 Degree of freedom.

  1. The (slightly stupid) first question is: Isotropy means there are no vectors "alive", Homogeneity means no distortions - i.e. no tensor "alive". That leaves us with 4(!!) scalars. I am GUESSING Homogeneity also ties in $A$ to $H_L$ but I guess I'm searching for someone to verify this.

  2. The second question is more involved (I think). Suppose I am dealing with a $5\times5$ matrix. The "SVT" decomp gives us: (1) scalar $\times1$, (3) vector $\times1$, (5) Tensor of degree 2 $\times1$, (7) Tensor of degree 3 $\times1$ and (9) Tensor of degree 4 $\times1$ = 1+3+5+7+9=25.

    However, enforcing symmetry (after all we are dealing with a metric) gives us $\frac{5\cdot6}{2}=15$ DOF. In the $4\times4$ case out of the scalar $\times1$, vector $\times1$, tensor $\times1$ and tensor 3-degree $\times1$, the symmetry "turns off" all of the 3rd degree tensor contributions except the scalar degree of freedom. And given that the $4\times4$ symmetric case is embedded in the $5\times5$ symmetric one we have 5 more degrees of freedom to account for. Now I am guessing the scalar of the 4th degree tensor is activated, and I can guess the remaining 4 degrees of freedom activate the 2 vectors and two tensors in the 3rd degree tensor.

Can anyone provide a methodical way of accounting for the "turned on/off" degrees of freedom in the general $N\times N$ symmetric matrix?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

OK,

So I figured out my own misconception.

Since the $N\times N$ matrix STILL has only two indexes, it can't embed any tensors over a 2nd degree. Thus my notion of a 3rd degree tensor is simply not correct. The right way to think about it is that in a $N\times N$ space-time, vector degrees of freedom have $N-1$ variables. They have $N$ entries, but the transformation rule that determines them to be vectors enforce one variable to be dependent on the other $N-1$.

By the same token, a general tensor now has a $N-1 \times N-1$. However, enforcing symmetry for the tensor means $\frac{(N-1)N}{2}$ variables, and the traceless condition removes an additional degree.

Let's test this on the $4\times 4$ case: We have (1) scalar, (3) vector and ($3\cdot 4 /2 -1 = 5$) tensor. The additional scalar comes from the trace of tensor that we took away previously. All in all: $1 + 3 +5 +1 =10$

Let's look at a 5-dimensional square symmetric matrix: We have (1) scalar, (4) vector, and ($4*5/2 -1=9$) tensor. Again we add another scalar to get: $(1+4+9+1=15)$.

In the general case: (1) scalar, $(N-1)$ vector, $(N(N-1)/2 -1)$ tensor + (1) scalar. i.e. $1+N-1 +\frac{N^2 -N}{2} -1 +1=\frac{N^2}{2} +\frac{N}{2} = \frac{N(N+1)}{2} $

What threw me off was the Laplacian eigenfunctions of the 3-dimensional space. The Laplacian eigenfunctions of a 4-dimensional space OBVIOUSLY look different. But they still have the same decomposition into: $$Q_0^{0}=\text{scalar}\\ Q_1^{0}=\text{scalar}\;, Q_1^{\pm 1}=\text{vectors}\\ $Q_2^{0}=\text{scalar}\;,Q_2^{\pm 1}=\text{vectors}\; , Q_2^{\pm 2}=\text{tensors}$$.

Anyway, the conclusion is that SVT decomp works for arbitrary $N\geq 4$ dimensions.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.