3
$\begingroup$

Peskin & Schroeder's expression of the Noether current If a (quasi-)symmetry is defined as a transformation that changes the action by a surface term i.e. $$S\to S'=S+\int d^4x \partial_\mu K^\mu(\phi_a),\tag{1}$$ or equivalently, the Lagrangian changes by a 4-divergence, $$\mathscr{L}\to\mathscr{L}'=\mathscr{L}+\partial_\mu K^\mu,\tag{2}$$ then considering transformations on the fields only, the expression of the Noether current turns out to be $$j^\mu(x)=\sum\limits_a\frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi_a)}\delta\phi_a -K^\mu.\tag{3}$$ P & S give the example of an internal transformation where $K^\mu=0$, and a spacetime transformation (namely, spacetime translation) under which $K^\mu\neq 0$.


Lewis Ryder's expression of the Noether current Here, the symmetry of the action is defined as a transformation that leaves the action invariant i.e. $$S\to S'=S.\tag{4}$$ Considering transformations $$x^\mu\to x^{\mu'}=x^\mu+\delta x^\mu,\\ \phi(x)\to\phi'(x)=\phi(x)+\delta\phi(x),$$ they derive the following expression for the Noether current $$j^\mu(x)=\sum\limits_a\frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi_a)}\delta\phi_a -\Theta^{\mu\nu}\delta x_\nu\tag{5}$$ where $\Theta^{\mu\nu}$ is the stress-energy tensor given by $$\Theta^{\mu\nu}=\sum\limits_a\frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi_a)}\partial^\nu\phi_a -\eta^{\mu\nu}\mathscr{L}.\tag{6}$$


Question $1$ Between $(3)$ and $(5)$ which expression of the Noether's current is more general?

Question $2$ By generalizing Ryder's definition of symmetry $(4)$ (to a quasi-symmetry, i.e., $(1)$), we will obtain $$j^\mu(x)=\sum\limits_a\frac{\partial \mathscr{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi_a)}\delta\phi_a -\Theta^{\mu\nu}\delta x_\nu-K^\mu.\tag{7}$$ Should $(7)$ be regarded as the most general expression of the Noether current?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Yes, OP's eq. (7) is the general expression for the Noether current of a single global continuous symmetry in field theory. Peskin & Schroeder (3) are only considering purely vertical transformations, cf. e.g. this related Phys.SE post.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.