3
$\begingroup$

While working on a completely unrelated quantum computing problem, I ran into a quantity that can be mapped to a partition function of spins on a triangular lattice. It is not quite an Ising model, though, since interaction happens between triplets of spins, some configurations are not allowed, and I don't explicitly have the Hamiltonian but only the weight of every configuration (I guess one could just pick a random value for the temperature and define a Hamiltonian, but it would probably just be a more complicated mess).

I have been trying to understand if I can use Montecarlo methods to get the partition function, but I am getting lost in the literature. From what I understood, my best shot would be to use something like the Wang-Landau algorithm to estimate the density of states and use that to get the partition function, but I couldn't find any paper detailing such a procedure so if someone could give me some good literature to look at (or any suggestions) that would be very helpful.

Thanks!

P.S. As far as I understand, Wang-Landau gives the density of states up to a normalization constant. However, in my specific case I have some conditions on this fictitious "partition function" that should allow me to infer that constant.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, you might want to look at my answer here to at least get started: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/550504/… $\endgroup$
    – Godzilla
    Jul 23 '20 at 16:38
  • $\begingroup$ What information do you have that lets you infer the normalization constant for the density of states, but doesn't let you infer the partition "function" (really just a single number, it sounds like) directly? $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Jul 29 '20 at 21:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Daniel I have dependence on a continuous parameter $\epsilon \in [0,1]$ and I know that the "partition function" is 1 in the limit of $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$. Since the density of states is an integer in this case, then this should allow me to get the normalization constant. $\endgroup$ Jul 31 '20 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ Ok! For $\epsilon$ near 0, you can use Monte Carlo to sample from the $\epsilon = 0$ distribution, and these samples will allow you to estimate the small-$\epsilon$ partition function pretty efficiently. Is an answer at small $\epsilon$ good enough for you? $\endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Jul 31 '20 at 19:00
0
$\begingroup$

The Ising model is fairly well studied, a good start might be this paper. Many numerical methods exist as well, which may be used, starting with metropolis-hastings and cluster algorithms like the Wolff/Swendsen-Wang algorithm. Frustrated systems and transverse field systems can be efficiently sampled using QMC algorithms like Determinant quantum MC (DQMC) and Stochastic Series Expansion (SSE).

Also, as far as I can remember the 2D triangular lattice is exactly solvable assuming there is no transverse field. I believe in that case you are looking for a solution using transfer matrix method.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I will look into these in the next days and let you know, thank you! $\endgroup$ Jul 31 '20 at 18:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.