In Feynman's third Douglas Robb Memorial Lecture (which took place in 1976 at University of Auckland), he states that:
- It's fine to approximate nuclei as a point, although they really aren't.
- Quantum electrodynamics explains everything except for radioactivity and gravity.
- Specifically, it explains the movement of electrons through space-time (a term that Feynman says he doesn't like, even though he uses it.)
In I. David Brown's book The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, 2016) he states:
Somewhat perversely, chemists have largely rejected this simple wave picture of the atom in favor of a hybrid view in which the charge is composed of a collection of electrons that are not waves but small particles. The density of the charge wave merely represents the probability that an electron will be found at a given location.... This model has many problems.... An electron is the smallest quantum of charge that can have an independent existence, but the free electrons that are attracted to a nucleus in order to form a neutral atom cease to exist the moment they are captured by the nucleus. They are absorbed into the charge wave and, like Lewis Carroll's (1865) Cheshire Cat that disappears leaving only its smile behind, the electron disappears bequeathing only its conserved properties: charge, mass and spin, to the charge wave surrounding the nucleus.
Chemical reactions happen when there is a re-arrangement of electrons followed by a movement of nuclei. Clearly there is movement of nuclei involved: if there was not, there would be chemical reactions at a distance. Two molecules come together, react, and then two different molecules leave.
So how does quantum electrodynamics account for the movement of nuclei, or is that outside the scope of the theory?