1
$\begingroup$

Given the following standard definitions of the two concepts, I fail to see how the chronological future differs from the future domain of dependence?

Chronological future: The chronological future of $S$, denoted $I^+(S)$, is the set of points that can be reached from $S$ by following a future-directed timelike curve.

Future domain of dependence: Let $(\mathcal{M},g)$ be a spacetime and $S \subset \mathcal{M}$ such that no two points on $S$ can be connected by a timelike curve (we also say that $S$ is achronal). The future domain of dependence of $S$, denoted $D^+(S)$ is the set of all points $p \in \mathcal{M}$ with the property that every past-directed inextendible (i.e. with no endpoints) timelike curve starting at $p$ intersects $S$.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is the word every that makes them different. In the first definition it says that a point can be reached by a timelike curve, but it doesn't mean that every timelike curve that goes through it must also go through S. $\endgroup$ – MBN Jun 25 at 12:03
0
$\begingroup$

The chronological future is the light cone. It's a cone that expands outwards as time goes on, because it consists of all the events that $S$ can influence. In other words, the events in $I^+(S)$ have at least one point of $S$ in their past:

(Taken from Hawking & Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time)

On the other hand, the domain of dependence, also called the Cauchy development, consists of those events that are completely determined by what happens in $S$, because all their past intersects $S$. This means that it's a cone that closes: as you go far enough into the future you can't predict anymore, because information from events outside $S$ has had enough time to arrive:

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.