-1
$\begingroup$

I have a closed box with a hole in the wall. A IR beam is directed at the front of the box. Due to a small 6mm borehole in the wall only a certain part of the beam can pass trough.

The left small pieces are IR sensors. I'm wondering now if I need an additional tube for focusing the beam like depicted?

Application is a light barrier and therfore the beam needs to be not wide but very narrow. 2nd question is: is there a difference if the ir sensor is placed like the right one or like on the left position? enter image description here

Light source TSAL6100 enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is the divergence of the beam? Judging from your HUGE hole diameter, $d=6mm$, the divergence is negligible. $\endgroup$ – Semoi Jun 20 at 7:01
  • $\begingroup$ To be honest I don't know exactly. I attached specs of the light source. The light beam could be 2m-10m far away from the sensor. When lessen the hole diameterI it get's less sensitiv and therefore I need more light(power) I assume? $\endgroup$ – user3435167 Jun 20 at 9:12
0
$\begingroup$

If the light source is more than $D=2m$ away, the hole with diameter $d=6mm$ samples a "small angle" of the $4\pi$ solid angle, and the light is in the regime where a geometric description using "rays of light" is applicable. Thus, you can estimate the diameter of the light ray at the detector by using geometric optics $$ \frac{d/2}{D} = \frac{d/2+x}{D+z} $$ enter image description here Compare the result to the size of your detector.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks that sounds good! z is in this case my tube, right? Is it also possible to calculate how wide is the part of the beam that needs to be cut by a subject that crosses the light beam so that there is no more light at the sensor? The sensor area is 5mm diameter $\endgroup$ – user3435167 Jun 20 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ Please draw a picture and check the rule of proportion by yourself. Don't rely on my calculation. To your second question: Of course you can do that calculation using geometrical optics. Both calculations are very similar. If you have done the first one, you just have to change some numbers. $\endgroup$ – Semoi Jun 20 at 12:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.