4
$\begingroup$

When watching Seans Carrol's "A Brief History of Quantum Mechanics", he mentioned around the 50th minute (the video I linked to starts at that point) that

[about quantum fields in vacuum] ... and guess what! The closer they are to each other, the more entangled they are.

Why is it so? I was under the impression that entanglement is not dependent on the distance (two entangled particles getting further from each other are not less entangled).


If this is at all possible I would be grateful for an answer understandable by an arts major - just kidding a bit, I simply would like to avoid an answer which starts with

enter image description here

courtesy of Redorbit

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I expect that Carrol is referring to cluster decomposition, a principle satisfied by many quantum field theories. This principle says that if two quantities are located in spacelike-separated regions very far from one another, then they are going to be uncorrelated. That is, if operators $A$ and $B$ are localized in two spacelike-separated regions a distance $\ell$ apart, we have $\langle A B \rangle \to \langle A \rangle\langle B \rangle$ as $\ell \to \infty$. We can usually give a more detailed statement of how quickly the correlation dies off. For example, in a theory of a field with mass $m$ the bound on the difference $\lvert\langle A B \rangle - \langle A \rangle\langle B \rangle\rvert$ goes like $e^{-m\ell}$, and in a massless theory the difference goes to zero faster than $\ell^{-N}$ for any $N$.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

I don't think you should pay any attention to this. Entanglement refers to quantum states, not to quantum fields.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.