Refering to the paper "Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation" by Almheiri et al. in arXiv:1991.12333. The authors consider Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity theory describing a nearly AdS2 spacetime coupled to CFT matter, where the dilaton background in Eq. (3.5) of the paper (before considering conical singularities in the problem) $$\phi=-\frac{2\pi\phi_r}{\beta}\frac{1}{\tanh \frac{\pi(y+\bar{y})}{\beta}}\quad \text{for}\quad ds^2=\frac{4\pi^2}{\beta^2}\frac{dy\:d\bar{y}}{\sinh^2\frac{\pi(y+\bar{y})}{\beta}},$$ ($\phi_r$ as a constant) is solution to the equations of motion $$(\phi+\phi_b)(R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}R)=8\pi G_N \langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle+(\nabla_\mu\nabla_\nu-g_{\mu\nu}\Box)\phi+g_{\mu\nu}\phi$$ which is true for $\langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle=0$ ($\phi_b$ as a constant). However, the set-up also includes CFT matter, i.e. $$I_{\text{total}}=I_{grav}\,[g_{\mu\nu},\:\phi]+\int d^2y\,\sqrt{-g}\;\mathcal{L}_{CFT}.$$ Later, the authors consider contributions from conical singularities to the energy momentum tensor, but it seems that the CFT action doesn't contribute to $\langle T_{\mu\nu}\rangle$ at any time. Could someone please explain why doesn't the CFT matter contribute to the solution in Eq. (3.5) and thereafter? Is it perphaps by the central charge $c\gg1$ limit that they consider?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.