Consider a Ring (radius $r$) rolling without slipping with angular speed $\omega$ on the surface. We want to find the radius of curvature of the top most point.
1.The radius of curvature(R): Regardless of the actual path that the particle travels, a particle at every instant can be thought of as tracing a circle, of radius=$R$. The top most point has, at the current instant, Velocity = $2\omega r \hat{i}$, and acceleration =-$\omega^2 R\hat{j}$. Using the radius of curvature formula: $R= v^2/a_{normal}$, we get $R=4r$.Which matches my textbook, and also fact that the radius of curvature of a cycloid, which is the path that any point on the rim of the ring traces, is $4r.$
- The Instantaneous axis of rotation(IAR): Each point on a rigid body can be thought of as tracing a circle at an instant, about a point known as the instantaneous center of rotation(c). The axis passing through C is the IAR.
It seems to me from these two statements that the distance of a point from the IAR must be equivalent to its radius of curvature. This is clearly not the case, as in a ring which is rolling without slipping , the IAR is at a distnace $2r$ from the top-most point.
What is the flaw in my interpretation?
Edit: Radius of curvature and Instantaneous Axis of Rotation seems quite similar. However, the top-voted answer has simply tried to explain $R=2r$, using the formula $v^2/a_{normal}$.This answer doesnt explain that why we get two different answers for the seemingly same thing.