1
$\begingroup$

The book Advanced Mean Field Methods mentions the following equation as a result of a "simple gaussian transformation".

$$ exp\left\{\frac{1}{2}\cdot\textbf{s}^T \cdot \textbf{J} \cdot\textbf{s}\right\} = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{N/2}\sqrt{det(J)}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \prod_i dx_i \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij}x_i(\textbf{J}^{-1})_{ij}x_j + \sum_ix_iS_i\right\} $$

It is assumed that $\textbf{J}$ is positive definite. I would like to derive this for myself as I try to with all the expression I come across. Looking at the right-hand side, it is very similar to a multivariate normal distribution with $\mu = \textbf{s}$ and $\Sigma=\textbf{J}$

$$\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{N/2}\sqrt{det(J)}} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}(\textbf{x}-\textbf{s})^T\textbf{J}^{-1}(\textbf{x}-\textbf{s})\right\}$$ $$ = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{N/2}\sqrt{det(J)}} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}\left(\textbf{x}^T\textbf{J}^{-1}\textbf{x} + \textbf{s}^T\textbf{J}^{-1}\textbf{s}\right) +\textbf{x}^T\textbf{J}^{-1}\textbf{s}\right\}. $$

We are missing some terms and gaining some extra terms. Here, I don't know how to proceed, or if I am on the right track. I would like to take the expectation of some $g(\textbf{x}) =e^{f(\textbf{x} ; \textbf{s})}$ with respect to the multivariate normal above to cancel the extra terms and add the missing ones. However, my attempts at solving for such an $g$ does not lead to an easily interpretable one nor give reason to think we would have equality. I feel I am not taking the right approach.

I would greatly appreciate ideas and insights. Thank you.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ note that the point is that in the exponent, $x$ couple to $S$ linearly. This should allow you to complete the square in the exponent on the r-h-s, and carry out the integral directly $\endgroup$
    – user245141
    May 28, 2020 at 11:22

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let's consider the argument of the exponential on the R.H.S.: $$ -\frac{1}{2} \bf{x}^T \bf{J}^{-1} \bf{x} + \bf{x}^T\cdot \bf{s} $$ the trick is to add and subtract here a suitable quantity to complete the square. The correct choice (suggested by the solution you have) is clearly $$ \frac{1}{2}\bf{s}^T \bf{J} \bf{s}. $$ After this your exponent reads: $$ \left(-\frac{1}{2} \bf{x}^T \bf{J}^{-1} \bf{x} + \bf{x}^T\cdot \bf{s} - \frac{1}{2}\bf{s}^T \bf{J} \bf{s} \right) + \frac{1}{2}\bf{s}^T \bf{J} \bf{s} $$ Now the term in brackets can be written as a quadratic form $-\frac{1}{2} \bf{y}^T \bf{J}^{-1} \bf{y}$ if you define $$ \bf{y} = \bf{x} - \bf{J}\bf{s} $$ and with the assumption that $\bf{J}$ is a symmetric matrix, so that $\bf{J}^T=\bf{J}$.

In conclusion, your integral can be performed with a linear change of variable $\bf{x} \to \bf{y}$ (notice that this is simply a shift of your variable, so the extrema remain infinite and the Jacobian of the transformation is the identity): $$ \frac{\exp{\left[\frac{1}{2}\bf{s}^T \bf{J} \bf{s} \right]}}{(2\pi)^{N/2}\sqrt{\det{\bf{J}}}} \int D\bf{y} \exp{\left[-\frac{1}{2} \bf{y}^T \bf{J}^{-1} \bf{y}\right]} = \exp{\left[\frac{1}{2}\bf{s}^T \bf{J} \bf{s} \right]}. $$ where I have used the standard Gaussian integral result in the last equality.

Notice that this formula is a very useful trick to study mean field theory in classical and quantum field theories of interacting systems, and is often called Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.