1
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have the EPR pair (maximally entangled state) as $|\phi\rangle$ and I apply an arbitrary matrix $U_3$ on the first qubit.

$$U_3 = \displaystyle \left[\begin{matrix}\cos{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)} & - e^{i \lambda} \sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)}\\e^{i \phi} \sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)} & e^{i \left(\lambda + \phi\right)} \cos{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)}\end{matrix}\right]$$

This is what I get after applying it to the first qubit:

$$|\phi_1\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(e^{i \lambda} e^{i \phi} \cos{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)}{\left|11\right\rangle} - e^{i \lambda} \sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)}{\left|10\right\rangle } + e^{i \phi} \sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)} {\left|01\right\rangle } + \cos{\left(\frac{\theta}{2} \right)}{\left|00\right\rangle }\right)$$

I was expecting it to be similar to what would happen if I applied $U_3$ to $|+\rangle$, but it's vastly different.

Curiously, if I measure either of the qubits, then I get half probability of measuring either $|0\rangle$ or $|1\rangle$ (though the remaining qubit remains in different states depending on if you measure first qubit or the second).

  1. Why does application of $U_3$ not affect the probability with which I get result of the partial measurement?
  2. Is such a thing (applying just a single-qubit operation on EPR Pair) a part of some phenomena / algorithm which is more easily understood?
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Can you spell out what $|\phi\rangle$ is? $\endgroup$ May 27, 2020 at 19:29

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The maximally entangled state $|\omega\rangle=|00\rangle+|11\rangle$ has the property $$ (U\otimes I)|\omega\rangle = (I\otimes U^T)|\omega\rangle\ . $$ That is, applying a unitary to the left qubit can be replaced by applying the different unitary $U^T$ to the right qubit.

However, applying a unitary to the 2nd qubit does not change the reduced density matrix of the first qubit. Thus, your result does not depend on whether you apply $U$.

Note that a similar relation holds for any maximally entangled state.


A different way of seeing the result is to consider the reduced density matrix of the first qubit: It is $$ \rho_1 = \tfrac12 I\ , $$ the maximally mixed state. This is invariant under $U$, $$ U\rho_1 U^\dagger = \rho_1\ , $$ and thus, measurement outcomes are the same (and completely random in any basis!) regardless whether you apply $U$ or not.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It's wild how applying a unitary to one of the qubits doesn't change the reduced density matrix of the second. I think it sort of makes sense, given the no-communication theorem. I still don't understand the general procedure involved in doing the calculation of these (e.g. how did you find that reduced density matrix of first qubit is half $I$)? $\endgroup$ May 28, 2020 at 7:55
  • $\begingroup$ @PeeyushKushwaha I recommend learning some basics of quantum information, like the first one or two chapters of a basic textbook. $\endgroup$ May 28, 2020 at 11:13
  • $\begingroup$ Alright, I'll try to get some more practice. $\endgroup$ May 28, 2020 at 12:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.