2
$\begingroup$

Let $(M,g)$ be a $d$-dimensional Lorentzian manifold and let $\Sigma \subset M$ be a null hypersurface, which therefore has dimension $(d-1)$. We know that its normal vector $k^\mu$ is null and since it is null, this normal vector is also tangent to the hypersurface. Its integral lines are null geodesics which are the generators of $\Sigma$.

My question here is essentially whether or not each connected component of $\Sigma$ can be foliated by spacelike sections indexed by some parameter along the generator. I've tried formalizing this as follows.

At each point $\sigma \in \Sigma$ we can pick some $(d-2)$-dimensional spacelike subspace $\Delta_\sigma\subset T_\sigma \Sigma$ which is a complement to the space $L_\sigma$ spanned by $k_\sigma\in T_\sigma \Sigma$, meaning that $T_\sigma \Sigma$ decomposes as a direct sum $$T_\sigma\Sigma\simeq \Delta_\sigma \oplus L_\sigma,\quad L_\sigma = \{\alpha k_\sigma:\alpha \in \mathbb{R}\}.$$

This gives rise to a $(d-2)$-dimensional spacelike distribution $\sigma\mapsto \Delta_\sigma$ over $\Sigma$.

Question: Is it always possible to pick $\Delta_\sigma$ so that the resulting distribution is integrable in each connected component of $\Sigma$? If in general $\Delta$ is not integrable globally inside each connected component of $\Sigma$, around each $\sigma\in \Sigma$ can we find one neighborhood of it $U\subset \Sigma$ so that $\Delta$ restricted to $U$ is integrable?

As an example this is trivially true for the double lightcone of the origin ${\cal C}$ in Minkowski spacetime. It has two connected components ${\cal C}^\pm$ and in each of them we can pick the spacelike complement at each $\sigma\in {\cal C}^\pm$ to be spanned by the angular vectors $\partial_\theta,\partial_\phi$ in spherical coordinates. Since $[\partial_\theta,\partial_\phi]=0$ the resulting distribution is integrable. In the end each component can indeed be foliated by spacelike sections which are diffeomorphic to $S^2$ and where the indexing is by the parameter along the generators. This renders the components with topology $\mathbb{R}\times S^2$. The question is essentially if this admits some generalization to arbitrary null hypersurfaces.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In the spirit of “Taub–NUT space as a counterexample to almost anything” can you check if it is possible to foliate Cauchy horizon of Taub–NUT? $\endgroup$ – A.V.S. May 26 at 8:35
2
$\begingroup$

The result is true at least locally. I do not think that it is valid globally.

I assume that $\Sigma$ is an immersed (at least) submanifold.

Take $p\in \Sigma$, then there is a local coordinate system $(u,x,y,z)$ in $M$ with domain an open neighborhood of $p$ such that a neighborhood $S\subset \Sigma$ of $p$ is represented by $u=0$. Since $\Sigma$ is lightlike, $g(du^\sharp,du^\sharp) =0$.

The vectors $\partial_x,\partial_y,\partial_z$ are therefore tangent to $\Sigma$ in $S$ and $x,y,z$ are coordinates in $S$ (viewed as an embedded submanifold).

Now observe that $$0= g(du^\sharp, du^\sharp) = \langle du^\sharp, du \rangle\:,$$ so that $du^\sharp \in TS$ as well. This smooth vector field can be integrated in $S$ since the conditions of Frobenius theorem are trivially satisfied. This means that we can change coordinates $x,y,z$ in $S$, passing to a new local coordinate system $v,r,s$ around $p$ such that $\partial_v = du^\sharp$.

Let us study the nature of the remaining coordinates $r,s$.

By construction $\partial_v$ is lightlike. Therefore for every $q\in S$ we can arrange an orthonormal basis of $T_qM$ where, for some constant $k\neq 0$, $$\partial_v \equiv k(1,0,0,1)^t\:.$$ Just in view of the definition of dual basis, we have that $$\langle \partial_r, du\rangle =0 \:, $$ which means $$g(\partial_r, \partial_v)=0\:.$$ Using the said basis and assuming $$\partial_r \equiv (a,b,c,d)^t$$ the orthogonality condition implies $$\partial_r \equiv (a,b,c,a)^t\:.$$ Hence $$g(\partial_r,\partial_r) = b^2+c^2 \geq 0$$ However, if $b=c=0$, we would have that $\partial_r$ is linearly dependent from $\partial_v$ which is not possible by construction. We conclude that $$g(\partial_r,\partial_r) = b^2+c^2 > 0$$ Therefore $\partial_r$ is spacelike. The same argument proves that $\partial_s$ is spacelike as well. Obviously these two vectors are also linearly independent as they arise from a coordinate system.

In summary, the surfaces in $S$ at $v=const$ are spacelike and $S$ is therefore foliated by spacelike surfaces (embedded submanifolds of $S$).

The procedure generalises to every dimension.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.