1
$\begingroup$

I often hear Bremsstrahlung being discussed in relation to electrons, for example, x-ray generation. Although I was reading a review on Proton Therapy and when discussing the influence of the various interactions within the body it quotes

proton Bremsstrahlung is theoretically possible, but at therapeutic proton beam energies this effect is negligible

Therapeutic energies are of the order of a 100 or so MeV, but it is unclear to me why electrons produce Bremsstrahlung radiation at far lower energies (KeV).

I suspect the answer may lie in the application, electrons are being fired at a dense material and hence slow down faster than protons would do through tissue which is relatively sparse.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

No, it is a feature of the particle involved and nothing (directly) to do with the target.

Bremsstrahlung is due to the radiation produced when charges are accelerated - braking counts as 'acceleration' - and the effect actually depends on the acceleration squared. .

This braking is produced by electrostatic forces between the charge of the particle and the charges of the target nuclei/electrons. These forces are pretty much the same for proton and for electron beams. But the electrons gets a bigger acceleration, by a factor $m_p/m_e=1836$ (plus relativistic effects). So the effect is bigger for electrons by a factor of several million.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So you're saying its a function of momentum, so lower mass suggests a larger deacceleration? It's also maybe worth commenting that I don't agree that the target is totally irrelevant since it is the target anatomy as such that causes the interactions leading to the deacceleration. $\endgroup$ Commented May 17, 2020 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnTracey "I don't agree that the target is totally irrelevant" , that is what the "directly" in the first sentence of the author implies. The relatively small differences in the solid state electric fields that allow to use charged particles for detection are to first order of magnitudes not relevant. $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented May 18, 2020 at 4:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.