The definition that was given to me by my professor said that a Lifschitz transition is when the topology of the Fermi surface changes. For example, if we have a one-dimensional Fermi surface, we would have some curve $E_\lambda(k)$ where $k$ ranges over the Brillouin zone and $\lambda$ is some real-valued parameter. If we vary $\lambda$, wouldn't a change in the topology imply the change in the number of singularities since this would actually change the topology of the curve/surface? Nevertheless, I have also been told that the transition occurs when the number of roots of $E_\lambda(k)$ changes. In this case, the topology won't necessarily change. For example, we can homeomorphically transform a curve with no singularities into another curve with no singularities but a different number of roots. As a concrete example, let $E_\lambda(k)=k^2+\lambda$. We have a different number of roots depending on if $\lambda$ is positive, negative or zero, but all of the curves are simply connected and closed, and therefore, have the same topology. What is the correct definition of Lifschitz transition?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.