1
$\begingroup$

let's consider ai infinite and flat sheet of charge distributed on a conductor. Well, it is known that the electric field at steady state on its surface (which is orthogonal to it) is equal to:

$\ E = \frac\sigma {2 \epsilon} $

where $\sigma$ is the surface charge density.

Now let's consider the specific case in which this conductor is a perfect electric conductor. Let's apply the interface conditions for electromagnetic fields, precisely for the normal component of the electric field (let's call 1 the space inside the conductor and 2 the space outside it):

$\ D_{2}-D_{1} = \sigma $

So, since the internal electric field is 0 in a perfect conductor, we get:

$\ D_{2} = \sigma $

that means:

$\ \epsilon \cdot E_{2} = \sigma $

Finally:

$\ E_{2} = \frac \sigma \epsilon$ that is double with respect to the field evaluated with the first method.

Notes: as stated in the reference of the first method, the conductor electric field is double than that of a simply sheet of charge (without speaking of conductors). But I have seen, for instance, people apply the equation $\ E = \frac\sigma {2 \epsilon} $ to find the E fild inside a parallel plate capacitor (there is also this evaluation in the reference). In this case, the plates are conductors, so why do not we use $\ E = \frac\sigma {\epsilon} $?

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A surface charge is defined to have zero thickness. It is therefore not possible to talk about a point "inside" it. Because all charge moves to the surface of a conductor, there will be two surface charges on an infinite conducting plane, one on each side.

The boundary condition for a surface charge density $\sigma$ is a difference of $\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$, where $\mathbf{\hat{n}}$ is the unit normal vector.

In fact, this boundary condition is derived from the electric field of a surface charge. Suppose you have some external electric field $\mathbf{E}$. Now place a uniform surface charge $\sigma$ in this field. We already know from first principles that the field of the surface charge is $\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$ above and $-\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$ below.

By the principle of superposition, the field immediately above the surface will be $\mathbf{E} +\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$, and the field immediately below will be $\mathbf{E} -\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$,

Thus, the discontinuity across the surface is obtained as $\left(\mathbf{E} +\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}\right) - \left(\mathbf{E} -\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}\right) = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} \mathbf{\hat{n}}$, as expected.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So, in case of a parallel plate capacitor, do we use $\ E = \frac\sigma {2 \epsilon} $ since we assume its plates very thin? $\endgroup$ – Kinka-Byo May 9 at 6:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Kinka-Byo No. For a parallel-plate capacitor, there is a positive charge on one plate and an equal amount of negative charge on the other. So there are 2 surface charges, $+\sigma$ and $-\sigma$. Thus, between the plates, we have two copies of $\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$, which gives $\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}$. $\endgroup$ – user7777777 May 9 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ and why do not we use $\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0} $ for each plate? $\endgroup$ – Kinka-Byo May 9 at 8:25
  • $\begingroup$ @Kinka-Byo As I have already said, the electric field of each plate is $\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$, and a capacitor has 2 such oppositely-charged plates. $\endgroup$ – user7777777 May 9 at 8:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Kinka-Byo Yes, if you choose to assume that the plates are not thin, then it will be $\frac{2\sigma}{\epsilon_0}$. This is because there are now 2 layers of surface charge on each plate (see the first part of my answer). So the value of $\sigma$ will be half of what it is supposed to be, because the same amount of charge on the plate is now evenly distributed over 2 layers instead of 1. So the capacitor equation $Q=CV$ still holds. $\endgroup$ – user7777777 May 9 at 14:16
0
$\begingroup$

On the other side of the sheet there is an electric field pointing in the opposite direction. The total discontinuity is therefore $\Delta \vec E = \sigma/\epsilon_0$, as you indeed find from the interface conditions.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.