1
$\begingroup$

Consider the Schwarschild solution $$d s^{2}=-\left(1-\frac{2 m}{r}\right) d t^{2}+\frac{d r^{2}}{1-\frac{2 m}{r}}+r^{2}\left(d \theta^{2}+\sin ^{2} \theta d \varphi^{2}\right) $$

and the radial null geodesics (in Schwarschild coordinates): $$t=\pm(2 m \ln |r-2 m|+r)+\text { constant }. $$

The advanced Eddington Finkelstein (EF) coordinates are defined as ($\bar{t}$,r,θ,φ) with $$\bar{t}=t+2 m \ln (r-2 m) $$

The metric in EF coordinates has the form: $$d s^{2}=-\left(1-\frac{2 m}{r}\right) d \bar{t}^{2} -\frac{4m}{r}d \bar{t} dr-\left(1+\frac{2m}{r}\right)dr^2+r^{2}\left(d \theta^{2}+\sin ^{2} \theta d \varphi^{2}\right) $$ which is not singular at $r=2m$ (but still singular at $r=0$). The incoming radial geodesics (corresponding to $-$) become: $$\bar{t}=-r+\text{constant} $$

and the outgoing (corresponding to $+$): $$\bar{t} = 4m\ln(r-2m) +r +\text{constant} .$$ My understanding is that the above definition for $\bar{t}$ is only valid for $r>2m$. However we use the solution in EF coordinates in all $r>0$ and when we draw the geodesics we extend them to $r=0$, even thought $\bar{t}$ is not defined for $r<2m$ since the quantity in $\ln$ is negative. The mathematical treatment seems a bit imprecise, what's up? I'd appreciate a more rigorous approach to this.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When you choose $(\bar{t}, r \ldots)$ instead of $(t, r \ldots)$ and notice that inside $r<2m$ the EF metric is a valid and regular solution, what you find is an extension (like an analytical extension) of the solution in the region $r>2m$ into a region below the event horizon. It was not there before because of the coordinate singularity in $r=2m,$ but now your new coordinates allow you to see that there is nothing strange for incoming geodesics in $r=2m.$ This is because there was no true singularity there but just a failure of the Schwarzschild original coordinates to describe the region close to the horizon. I believe some textbooks discuss this, D'Inverno, Ryder, etc. talk about it. But in short, usually physicist extend the solution of one region where it works into another.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.