1
$\begingroup$

Starting from the definition of Helmholtz free energy: $$F:=U-TS$$ (where $U$ is the internal energy , $T$ temperature and $S$ entropy) we derive in few steps the following relation: $$F=-T\int \frac{U}{T^2}\mathrm d T+ \text{constant} \tag{1}$$

Now, we know also that Maxwell relations holds so at $T=\text{constant}$ we have: $$P=-\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \tag{2}$$

In ideal gas the internal energy have the following form: $$U=\frac{3}{2} NT \tag{3}$$

If i substitute $(3)$ in $(1)$ and put the result in $(2)$ i should find the classical equation of state for ideal gas: $$ PV=NT \tag{4}$$ ...but from calculation i don't find this. Where is the error in my steps? It could be in the value of the constant ?


Yes, wrong word. Anyway we can say something about this function a posteriori :

$$ p = - \frac{\partial F}{\partial V} = -C'(V) T. $$

Using (4) in this equation we obtain $$ C(V) = N * ln(V)+ constant$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ 1) is a general relation? $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '20 at 12:54
  • $\begingroup$ I would say yes. From Maxwell relations we have "S= -∂F/∂T" for V=const. Insert in the definition of F, put F under the derivative wrt T and obtain : -U/T^2 = ∂/∂T ( F/T). Then simply integrate. No other assumption in this derivation $\endgroup$
    – maru0032
    Apr 26 '20 at 13:00
1
$\begingroup$

In 1) there is additive "constant" of integration. The integration is only over $T$, the terms may depend also on volume $V$ which can be arbitrary. Therefore the "constant" in that integration over $T$ can be actually a function of $V$:

$$ F(T,V) = -T\int \frac{U}{T^2}dT + C(V)T. $$

Since the first term, for an ideal gas, does not depend on volume, the only part relevant for calculating pressure from $F$ is the second term:

$$ p = - \frac{\partial F}{\partial V} = -C'(V) T. $$

The conclusion is, we cannot infer the familiar equation of state of ideal gas $p = nc_V T / V$ just from knowing $U = nc_V T$. The above result suggests large class of functions of $C(V)$ is consistent with $U=nc_VT$. But we did find at least that pressure must be proportional to temperature $T$.

In Callen there is a rationale for this - the equation $U=nc_VT$ is not the fundamental form, that is, $U$ is not expressed as function of its natural parameters $S,V$. If it was, we should be able to derive the equation of state from it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, i suppose that the trick was in the constant. But if i start from P=NT/V we have that -dF/dV = NT/V. Integrati h we find F=...+C. We cant deduce the value of the constant from this relation and the previuos? $\endgroup$
    – maru0032
    Apr 26 '20 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ Both integrations introduce one unknown function: the first integration introduced function $C(V)$, the second integration introduced another function $D(T)$. There is no constant in numerical sense, these are functions. $\endgroup$ Apr 26 '20 at 23:51
  • $\begingroup$ But a posteriori we can deduce the form of this function ,right?(see what i’ve added) $\endgroup$
    – maru0032
    Apr 27 '20 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that seems possible. $\endgroup$ Apr 27 '20 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.