1
$\begingroup$

I am learning General Relativity from Leonard Susskind's Lectures. In Lecture three, he introduces to covariant derivatives, and I understood it's meaning. But when he applies it to a Tensor, I am having some confusion. If we consider the Tensor $T_{mn}$ , it's covariant derivative $D_sT_{mn}$ , he says is given as $$D_sT_{mn}=\partial_sT_{mn}-\Gamma^t_{ms}T_{tn}-\Gamma^t_{ns}T_{tm}$$ Where $\partial_sT_{mn}$ represents the derivative of the Tensor with respect to $x^s$, while the Gamma's are the Christoffel Symbols. My question is that why are the contravariant indices of both the Christoffel symbols (The index t in this case) the same.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's a dummy index. You can rename them if it confuses you. $\endgroup$ – ApolloRa Apr 18 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ @ApolloRa I know that it is a dummy index, but the equation won't remain the same if the said indices were different. If they were different, say t and u, then the sum (the above represents sums of equations) would contain terms like t=0 with u=1, but if there were only t, it wouldn't have such terms $\endgroup$ – SK Dash Apr 18 at 11:27
2
$\begingroup$

The left hand side has three indices: $m,n,s$. These are free indices. In order for this equation to be correct the right hand side must have the same $m,n,s$ free indices. Indeed it does. The $t's$ are dummy indices. It doesn't matter how you name them. You can change the $t's$ (of course both $t's$ of each term or else they will not mean summation) to whatever you like. Examples:

$$D_sT_{mn}=\partial_sT_{mn}-\Gamma^u_{ms}T_{un}-\Gamma^t_{ns}T_{mt}$$ $$D_sT_{mn}=\partial_sT_{mn}-\Gamma^u_{ms}T_{un}-\Gamma^u_{ns}T_{mu}$$ $$D_sT_{mn}=\partial_sT_{mn}-\Gamma^a_{ms}T_{an}-\Gamma^b_{ns}T_{mb}$$

All the above equations are the same.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Although, shouldn't the last term have $T_{mt}$ instead of $T_{tm}$, for the covariant derivative to be correct? $\endgroup$ – Elias Riedel Gårding Apr 18 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Elias Riedel Gårding Indeed yes! I didnt check the equation in the question! Thanks for pointing it out! For an arbitary tensor $T_{mn} !=T_{nm}$ $\endgroup$ – ApolloRa Apr 18 at 12:09
  • $\begingroup$ I would still take my stand, this is because, the dummy indices are summed over, so if we had separate variables, in this case a and b, we sum over a separately and b separately, so there are cases in which a is not the same as b, but if they had the same contravariant indices, there wouldn't be any cross terms, a and b must be the same. $\endgroup$ – SK Dash Apr 18 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ a and b are summed over the same "numbers". Consider a four dimensional spacetime, then a = 0,1,2,3 and b =0,1,2,3. Does this makes things clearer??? $\endgroup$ – ApolloRa Apr 18 at 13:44
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm okay I got the point you are trying to make, thank you $\endgroup$ – SK Dash Apr 19 at 0:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.