0
$\begingroup$

Given a lattice with primitive vectors $\{\mathbf{g_i}\}$, one can write the position of any lattice point as $\mathbf{R}_n = n^i \mathbf{g_i}$ with $n^i \in Z$. Quantites, such as electron density, have to be periodic on the lattice, that is, invariant to $\mathbf{R}_n$ translations. This condition implies that in the Fourier transform of those quantities only terms with wave vector $\mathbf{G}$ can appear for which

$\mathbf{G} \cdot \mathbf{R}_n = N$ with $N \in Z$

One can then introduce the reciprocal lattice vectors $\{\mathbf{g^i}\}$ and see that $\mathbf{G} = m_i \mathbf{g^i}$ with $m_i \in Z$ indeed satisfies the above equation. My question is, how can we see that these are the only solutions to the above equation? Is it possible that other $\mathbf{G}$ which cannot be written in the form $ m_i \mathbf{g^i}$ is also a solution? If not, why?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Well, those ‘other’ reciprocal space solutions would need to Fourier transform back to real space solutions. And that doesn’t happen for the Fourier transform. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Apr 15, 2020 at 0:35

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Your reciprocal lattice vectors should satisfy $$ \mathbf{G}\cdot\mathbf{R}_n\in \mathbb{Z}\quad \forall \mathbf{R}_n $$

in particular this includes your primative lattice vectors $\mathbf{g}_i$. If $\mathbf{G} = \mathbf{G}_0 + c \mathbf{g}^i$ with $\mathbf{G}_0\cdot\mathbf{g}_i = 0$ then $$ \mathbf{G}\cdot \mathbf{g}_i = c \Rightarrow c \in \mathbb{Z} $$ We can then apply the same argument to all $\mathbf{g}_i$ to conclude that $$ \mathbf{G} = m_i\mathbf{g}^i,\;m_i\in \mathbb{Z} $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.