1
$\begingroup$

Where is the rules for tensor product of representations of Lorentz group $(a,b)\otimes (c,d)$ without decomposition of one of these in orthogonal sum?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ WP. What is your specific problem with $(a\otimes c, b\otimes d)$? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 13, 2020 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ For example $$(1/2,1/2)\otimes (1/2,1/2)\otimes (1/2,1/2)=(3/2,3/2)$$ $\endgroup$
    – fika97
    Commented Apr 13, 2020 at 16:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I was reading also physics.stackexchange.com/questions/113798/… $\endgroup$
    – fika97
    Commented Apr 13, 2020 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ So you wish to compose symmetrically three 4-vectors to a 16-dimensional Lorentz rep by shedding 48 d.o.f's? Try working out directly what $J_x$ would look like in this rep. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 13, 2020 at 16:36
  • $\begingroup$ Where I can find that group (a,b)⊗(c,d) =(a⊗c,b⊗d) ? $\endgroup$
    – fika97
    Commented Apr 13, 2020 at 16:46

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Your answer is there for the appreciating in WP 3.2.1.2, and all you need is understand the notation. (Several people attach to Ch. 5, of v I of Weinberg's QFT text.) There may be a confusion of the tensor product ⊗ used in both linking the Lorentz Group left ideal A to the right one B but also, again with common rotation angles!, to the Kronecker multiplication of different su(2) representations involved ("adding spins"). So in Kronecker multiplying two Lorentz representations, you consider "synchronized swimming" rotations in both the spaces of A and B, as well as the tensor space of the spins added. There may be an elegant notation around stressing the distinction, but it might not be worth the trouble, as essentially all operators, see below, commute with each other and act on different subspaces.

Consider a rotation around the x axis, so the generator $J_x$, in the (m,n) representation, of dimensionality N=(2m+1)(2n+1), so (reducible) N×N matrices, $$ \pi_{(m,n)}(J_x) =1\!\! 1_{(2m+1)} \otimes J^{(n)}_x + J^{(m)}_x \otimes 1\!\!1_{(2n+1)} . $$ The N×N matrix is the sum of two such: the first that leaves the (2m+1) dimensional space alone and rotates the (2n+1)-vectors, and, symmetrically, the one that rotates (2m+1) -vectors leaving (2m+1) -vectors alone. The angle of rotation is the same for $\pi_{m,n} ; J_x^{(m)}; J_x^{(n)}$. I chose a rotation, since the Lorentz ideals treat it identically, unlike boosts, for instance.

Now, adding two reps, spin m and n would yield a composite representation coproduct Δ of dimensionality N again, via the very same formula (!). For example, if you added two spin 1/2 (doublets), as proposed in your comment, you'd get a coproduct $$ J^{(1/2)}_x=\frac{1}{2} \sigma_x ~~~~~~ \leadsto ~~~~~\Delta_{(1/2,1/2)}(J_x)= \frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0&1\\ 1& 0&1&0\\ 0&1&0&1\\ 1& 0&1&0 \end{pmatrix}. $$ It might not show it, but, by a change of basis similarity transformation, this generator is reducible to a spin 0 singlet rep, and a spin 1 triplet rep,
$$ J_x^{(1)}= \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} \begin{pmatrix} 0&1&0 \\ 1& 0&1 \\ 0&1&0 \end{pmatrix}. $$ Adding yet another spin 1/2 doublet to this triplet, as described above, yields a 6×6 matrix, which, Clebsching out a doublet, nets you a spin 3/2 quartet, $$ J_x^{(3/2)}= \frac{1}{ 2} \begin{pmatrix} 0&\sqrt 3 &0 &0 \\ \sqrt 3 & 0&2 & 0 \\ 0&2&0& \sqrt 3 \\ 0&0 & \sqrt 3 &0 \end{pmatrix}. $$

So, for your (1/2,1/2)⊗(1/2,1/2)⊗(1/2,1/2)=(3/2,3/2)+ ... comment example, the triple Kronecker product Lorentz rep would be a 16-dimensional one, as detailed, $$ \pi_{(3/2,3/2)}(J_x) =1\!\! 1_{(4)} \otimes J^{(3/2)}_x + J^{(3/2)}_x \otimes 1\!\!1_{( 4)} . $$ (a,b)⊗(c,d) =(a⊗c,b⊗d) has been applied, so (1/2,1/2)⊗(1/2,1/2)⊗(1/2,1/2)=(1/2⊗1/2⊗1/2,1/2⊗1/2⊗1/2).

Observe how the reducible dross of 48 states has beed discarded in Clebsching: the ... ellipsis reps.

You started out by composing three 4-vectors, 64 states, and you ended up with a mere 16-tuplet! neat, huh?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.