3
$\begingroup$

In quantum computing, we can write our wave function as: $$ |\psi\rangle=\alpha|0\rangle+\beta|1\rangle $$ which can be rewritten as $$ |\psi\rangle=\cos(\theta/2)|0\rangle+e^{i\phi}\sin(\theta/2)|1\rangle $$ ignoring the global phase. This can be represented in a Bloch sphere where theta and phi are angles on the sphere. That being said, my question is, how is this rewritten equation found and why is there a $e^{i\phi}$ term multiplied by the $\sin(\theta/2)$? And what does this additional phase represent? And finally, why is it on the sine rather than the cosine? Thank you! To preface, I am currently an undergraduate physics junior who is doing research on QC/QI.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ To elaborate more on ZeroTheHero's great answer, I asked a similar question about the meaning of the relative phase in the wave function a couple of years ago, and the answer there shows how the relative phase can change measurement results: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/177588/… $\endgroup$ Apr 13, 2020 at 9:30

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

This is covered in very many textbooks. One example is the book of John Townsend. Anyways the point is if you write $$ \vert\psi\rangle = \alpha \vert 0\rangle +\beta \vert 1\rangle $$ you need $\vert\alpha\vert^2+\vert\beta\vert^2=1$ for normalization. Thus $$ \alpha=e^{i a}\cos\frac{1}{2}\theta\, ,\qquad \beta=e^{i b}\sin\frac{1}{2}\theta $$ will do the trick so one writes \begin{align} \vert\psi\rangle =e^{i a}\left(\cos(\textstyle\frac{1}{2}\theta)\vert 0\rangle + e^{i\phi} \sin(\textstyle\frac{1}{2}\theta)\vert 1\rangle\right) \tag{1} \end{align} with $\phi=b-a$ and choose $a=0$ since the factor $e^{i a}$ is an overall phase. It is conventional to choose the coefficient of $\vert 0\rangle$ to be real.

The half angle is related to the rotation properties of spin states. Alternatively, opposite spin states in 3D space are orthogonal in spin-1/2 space so set $\theta=0$ (North pole state) to get $\vert 0\rangle$ and $\theta=\pi$ (South pole state) to get $\vert 1\rangle$, which are indeed orthogonal.

This is the most general form. The relative phase $e^{i\phi}$ controls the interference between the two states. You can see its effects by computing and comparing the average values of $\hat \sigma_x$ and $\hat \sigma_y$ on (1): these average values are explicitly $\phi$-dependent.

Moreover the eigenstates of $\hat \sigma_x$ and $\hat \sigma_y$ only differ by a relative phase factor.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.