Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ placed in the same point be the source of two waves which are propagating in the same line, also the phase differernce between the two waves $\Delta\phi=0$. Equation of the two waves is given by $y_1=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx)$ and $y_2=A_2\sin(ωt-kx)$ respectively.

Now at the distance $x_1$ from the sources, the equations of SHM of a particle become $$\begin{align} y_1=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx_1) \quad \text{(for wave 1)} \\ y_2=A_2\sin(\omega t-kx_1) \quad \text{(for wave 2)} \end{align}$$ the resultant equation of SHM is given by just adding the two equation $$y_n=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx_1)+A_2\sin(\omega t-kx_2)$$

As written in my book the equation can repressented like $y_n=A_n\sin(\omega t-kx_1-\theta)$ where $A_n$ is the net maximum displacement due to the two waves and $\theta$ is phase difference. To find $A_n$ and $\theta$, we treat $A_1$ and $A_2$ as vector and consider the angle between them is same with the phase difference of two SHM $\Delta\phi$ .

According to the above $$A_n =\sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(\Delta\phi)}.$$ The equation is good one when the waves are in the same line. Because if $\Delta\phi=0$ then the displacement for the each waves just add up and give the total displacement which also can be find by the above equation $$A_n= \sqrt{(A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(0)}= \sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2} =A_1+A_2$$

Also the formula is effective when the waves are in the same line and phase of two SHM differ by $\pi$ as here the total displacement is the subtraction of two displacement due to the individual waves. I believe that the equation is valid for any other cases where the waves are in the same line though I do not find any reason why the angle between $A_1$ and $A_2$ displacement would be equal to the phase difference of two SHM due to the waves.

Though I have seen in the above two cases, it is undoutlessly applicable as when the phase difference is 0 the directions of the two displacement are same and when the phase difference is $\pi$, we can subtract the minor displacement from the mazor as the direction of the displacements are opposite . Those two cases show that we can take $A_1$ and $A_2$ as vector , also phase difference $\Delta\phi$ can be taken as angle between $A_1$ and $A_2$ . But when we think about any other cases where the phase difference is not $0$ or $\pi$ but the ange between the displacement is either $0$ or $\pi$ (when the particles go in the same direction the angle is $0$ and when they go opposite the angle is $\pi$) (note- I am assuming the waves are in the same line)

Then in those cases , why do we use the phase difference $\Delta\phi$ as the angle between $A_1$ and $A_2$ insteat of $0$ and $\pi$.

Another problem with the equation i find when i think such a case where the waves are not in the same line.

Let the equation of two waves be $y_1=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx)$ and $y_2=A-2\sin(\omega t-kx)$ respectively. Now the two waves superpose at point $P$ with the angle $\pi/2$ means the waves are perpendicular with each other. let the distance travelled by the first wave to reach point $P$ be equal to distance travelled by the second wave to reach point $P$. If the distance is $x_1$
then the equation of of SHM of a particle on point $P$ (the point of superposition) become $$\begin{align} y_1=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx_1) \quad \text{(for wave 1)} \\ y_2=A_2\sin(\omega t-kx_1) \quad \text{(for wave 2)} \end{align}$$

We can see clearly that the phase difference between two SHM $\Delta\phi$ is $0$ as the path difference $∆x$ is $0$.

So according to my book the equation of resultant SHM is given by
$$\begin{align} y_n&=y_1+y_2 \\ &=A_1\sin(\omega t-kx_1)+A_2\sin(\omega t-kx_2) \\ &=A_n\sin(\omega t-kx_1-θ) \end{align}$$

$$\begin{align} A_n&=\sqrt{(A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(\Delta\phi)} \\ &=\sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(0)} \quad \text{(as phase difference is 0)} \\ &=\sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2)} \\ &=A_1+A_2 \end{align}$$

But if we imagine the the situation we will find the angle between $A_1$ and $A_2$ is $\pi/2$ as the waves superpose by the angle of $\pi/2$. So the value of $A_n$ should be equal to $$\begin{align} A_n&= \sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(π/2)} \\ &=\sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2} \quad \text{(as two SHM are same phase so when $y_1=A_1$, $y_2=A_2$)} \end{align}$$

That does not match with the above which i got using my book formula.

Please explain the two things

  • Why do we take the angle between vector A₁ and A₂ same as phase difference of two SHM of medium partical at the point of superposition.
  • Can the equation of total maximum amplitude $Aₙ=\sqrt{A_1^2+A_2^2+2A_1A_2\cos(\Delta\phi)}$ be used though the waves are not in the same line.
  • $\begingroup$ So let say you have two waves $A_{1}e^{j\mathbf{k1}.\mathbf{r}-\omega t}$, $A_{2}e^{j\mathbf{k2}.\mathbf{r}-\omega t}$, with $\vert \mathbf{k_{1}} \vert=\vert \mathbf{ k_{2} }\vert$=k, the angle $(\mathbf{k_{1}},\mathbf{k_{2}})= \theta$, what exactly do you want to know? $\endgroup$ – user8736288 Apr 6 '20 at 15:17

For your first question I assume what you want is a derivation of your formula. What you want is to express the real part of $A_{1}e^{j(-kx+\omega t)}+A_{2}e^{j(-kx+\omega t+\phi)}$ as new expression which is the real part of $A_{n}e^{-j(kx+\omega t+ \psi)}$ so you may simply write: $$ A_{1}e^{j(kx-\omega t)}+A_{2}e^{j(kx-\omega t+\phi)} = (A_{1} +A_{2}e^{j\phi})e^{j(kx-\omega t)}$$ Now since the complex $(A_{1} +A_{2}e^{j\phi})=(A_{1}+A_{2}\cos(\phi)+ j A_{2}sin(\phi))$ its modulus is indeed $A_{n}=\sqrt{A_{1}^{2} +A_{2}^{2}+ 2A_{1}A_{2}\cos(\phi)}$ and its argument is $\psi=\left( \frac {A_{2}\sin(\phi)}{A_{1}+A_{2}\cos(\phi)} \right)$.

For your second question, beware that the angle difference in the phasors representing your waves cannot be identified with the angle between the vectors $\mathbf{k_{1}}$ and $\mathbf{k_{2}}$ (I assume $\vert \mathbf{k_{1}} \vert = \vert \mathbf{k_{2}} \vert =k )$ that is, the angle between the vectors defining the direction of propagation of 2 waves $A_{1}e^{j(\mathbf{k_{1}}\mathbf{r} -\omega t)}$ and $A_{1}e^{j(\mathbf{k_{2}}\mathbf{r} -\omega t)}$. Assuming you look at the field in a particular direction such that $\mathbf{r}=r\mathbf{i}$, and denoting $\theta_{1}$ the angle between $\mathbf{i}$ and $\mathbf{k_{1}}$, $\theta_{2}$ the angle between $\mathbf{i}$ and $\mathbf{k_{2}}$, we have: $$ \mathbf{k_{1}}.\mathbf{r}= k\cos(\theta_{1})r=k_{1}r$$ $$ \mathbf{k_{2}}.\mathbf{r}= k\cos(\theta_{2})r=k_{2}r$$ The resulting field along $\mathbf{i}$ is: $$ A_{1}e^{j(k_{1}r -\omega t)} + A_{2}e^{j(k_{2}r -\omega t)} $$ So the difference of phase between the two phasors is not constant, it is equal to $(k_{2}-k_{1})r$ and depends on $r$, your formula may thus not be so useful in this case. Of course in the particular case when $\theta_{1} = \theta_{2}=\theta$ then $k_1= k_2= k\cos(\theta)$ and the resulting fied simply writes: $$ (A_{1}+A_{2})e^{j(kcos(\theta)r -\omega t)}$$ Hope it helps.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.