I am trying to get that the path integral of the parallel transport action is the Wilson loop. Here is the setting:

Let $w$ be a complex vector dimension $N$, and $A_{\mu}$ a fixed Yang-Mills connection. We will work with $G=SU(N)$. Using the parallel transport equation and the constraint:

$$i\frac{dw}{d\tau} = \frac{dx^{\mu}}{d\tau} A_{\mu}w$$ $$w^{\dagger}w=1 $$ We construct the following action with a Lagrange multiplier $\lambda$ enforcing the constraint above. Evidently the equation of motion of this action is the parallel transport equation. $$S_w = \int \left(i w^{\dagger}\frac{dw}{dt} + \lambda(w^{\dagger}w-1)+w^{\dagger}A(x(\tau))w \right)d\tau$$

This vector satisfies: $$[w_i,w_j^{\dagger}]=\delta_{ij}$$

Now let $\tau \in \mathbf{S}$ to allow for large gauge transformations. I finally arrive to the following path integral, where I had to insert the $w_i$ factors for it to not vanish:

$$ Z_w[A]= \int e^{iS_w (w;\lambda;A)} w_i(\tau=\infty)w_i^{\dagger}(\tau=-\infty) \mathcal{D}\lambda\mathcal{D}w \mathcal{D}w^{\dagger}$$

I am supposed to get that

$$Z_w[A] = tr \mathcal{P}e^{i\int A d\tau}$$

How do I compute that specific path integral?

  • $\begingroup$ I think, that commutation equation, that you wrote, are in canonical quantization. But you are interested in path integral quantization of such system, right? $\endgroup$ – Nikita Apr 6 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. I was providing background for both quantizations, but mainly I'm interested in path integral. $\endgroup$ – Alonso Perez Lona Apr 6 at 17:09
  • $\begingroup$ Is it obvious, that path integral vanishes, if one didn't inserted $w_i$ factors? $\endgroup$ – Nikita Apr 6 at 19:21

I will follow Monopoles and Wilson Lines, by David Tong, Kenny Wong.

Let's work in perturbation theory. Action: $$ S_w = \int \left(i w^{\dagger}\frac{dw}{dt} + \alpha(w^{\dagger}w-\kappa)+w^{\dagger}A(x(\tau))w \right)d\tau $$ Propogator for free (non-interacting) part of action, in following we use $\langle \dots \rangle$ for averaging by free theory: $$ \langle w_i^\dagger(\tau_1) w_j(\tau_2)\rangle = \theta(\tau_1-\tau_2) \delta_{ij} $$

  1. Vacuum bubbles

As usual in perturbation theory, we can factorise vacuum diagrams. You will obtain up to notations:

All $n ≥ 2$ factors vanish because the product of the step functions vanishes everywhere except on a set of measure zero. So we have only one contribution ($\theta(0)=1/2$): $$ \exp\left(i (N/2 - \kappa )\int dt\; \alpha(t)\right) = \exp\left(-i \kappa_{eff} \int dt\; \alpha(t)\right) $$

  1. Path integral with insertions

$$ Z_w[A]= \int\mathcal{D}\lambda\mathcal{D}w \mathcal{D}w^{\dagger}\; e^{iS_w (w;\lambda;A)} w_i(\tau=\infty)w_i^{\dagger}(\tau=-\infty) $$

This integral correspond to following series of diagrams (times to vacuum bubbles factor):

This series correspondence to:

Including vacuum bubbles we left with:

$$ Z_\omega[A] = W[A]\int D\alpha e^{-i\int dt \;\alpha(t) (\kappa_{eff}-1)} $$

If $\kappa_{eff}= 1$, we obtain:

$$ Z_\omega[A] = W[A] $$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Could you summarize why without insertion of the $w$ and $w^{\dagger}$ the path integral vanishes? Also, what would be the difference if there is no $\lambda$ apart from not conserving the norm of $w$? $\endgroup$ – Alonso Perez Lona Apr 7 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ Without insertion you will have only $\int D\alpha e^{-i\int dt \alpha(t)\kappa_{eff}}= \delta(\kappa_{eff})$. $\endgroup$ – Nikita Apr 7 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ What about without imposing $\alpha$? $\endgroup$ – Alonso Perez Lona Apr 7 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your question. $\alpha$ is present in action from initial step. $\endgroup$ – Nikita Apr 7 at 20:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, formally this integral is infinity, so you need be ore careful when deal with correlators. You need divide integral by average of identity operator. Infinity will be cancel. $\endgroup$ – Nikita Apr 8 at 1:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.