2
$\begingroup$

I'm currently reading a book (in Danish) about the Friedmann equations and I have stumbled upon a third degree polynomial:

$$ \Omega_\Lambda = \frac{4K_0^3}{27\Omega_0^2} = \frac{4(\Omega_0 + \Omega_\Lambda -1)^3}{27\Omega_0^2} $$

Where $\Omega_0$ is called the density parameter (defined as $\frac{\rho}{p_c}$) and $\Omega_\Lambda=\frac{\Lambda}{3H_0^2}$. Here $H_0$ is the Hubble parameter. $K_0$ is in my book called the current curvature of space.

According to the book if the above third degree polynomial is solved with respect to $\Omega_\Lambda$ then it's possible to plot $\Omega_\Lambda$ as a function of $\Omega_0$ and create a "map" of different types of universes (no Big Bang, run-away universes and Big Crunch universes). Here is the "map": enter image description here

My question is: How is this third degree polynomial derived from the Friedmann equations and why does solving it make it possible to classify different universes?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For me it's unclear what you mean with density parameter, $\Omega_0$. I guess that $\rho$ in your book is the total density (not counting curvature) ? And maybe you wanted to write the critical density $\rho_c$ (instead of $p_c$), defined as $3 H_0^2/ 8 \pi G$? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 28, 2020 at 21:33
  • $\begingroup$ You need to give us more background about the equation. What kind of universe is this. What is $\Omega_0$ ? Is it $\Omega_0 = \Omega_{\Lambda} $ or $\Omega_0 = \Omega_{\Lambda} + \Omega_m$ etc ? Is there an english version of the book that you can share the name for us ? Theres not much information that we can analyse $\endgroup$
    – seVenVo1d
    Commented Mar 29, 2020 at 14:05

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Usually one defines $$\Omega_0 = \frac{8\pi G\rho_0}{3H_0^2},\ \ \ \Omega_k = -\frac{k}{H_0^2a_0^2}, \ \ \ \Omega_\Lambda = -\frac{\Lambda}{2H_0^2} $$ Then the Friedmann equation can be written $$\dot a^2 = H_0^2(\Omega_0\frac{a_0^3}{a} + \Omega_k a_0^2 + \Omega_\Lambda a^2 ) . $$ At current time this gives the identity $$ \Omega_0 + \Omega_k + \Omega_\Lambda \equiv 1 . $$

This accounts for the right hand equality, by cancelling factors and taking the cube root, but I don't know why the author wants to use $K_0 = -\Omega_k$

I can only think the left hand equality must be a typo. You can have $K_0 = 0$ without constraining $\Omega_\Lambda$. The "map" does not make a great deal of sense, because big bang models are possible for all values of the parameters. In this diagram showing general properties of the Friedmann models the critical value $\Lambda_E$ refers to Einstein's static solution for which $\dot a = 0, a=a_E$, constant, for which the Friedmann equation reduces to $$0 = \frac{2M}{a_E^3} - \frac{1}{a_E^2} + \frac{\Lambda_E}{3} $$

Friedmann Models

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.