5
$\begingroup$

I often see that the density operator in $1^{st}$ quantization is defined to be: $$ \hat n(\vec r)=\sum_{i=1}^N \delta(r-\hat r_i)$$

In canonical quantization it is given by $$ \hat n(\vec r)=\hat \psi^\dagger(\vec r)\hat\psi(\vec r)$$ but shouldn't there be a factor of $N$ multiplying since in the definition of the expectation value of $\hat n$, we act with $\delta(r-\hat r_i)$ on the ket $N$ times?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It may be tricky to explain why it is so (because it essentially means explaining the second quantization), but note that this is the case for all the single-particle operators! For example, the kinetic energy of a collection of identical particles in the first quantization is $$\hat{K} = \sum_i\frac{\hat{p}_i^2}{2m},$$ and becomes in the second quantization $$\mathcal{\hat{K}} = \int dx \psi^\dagger(x)\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}\psi(x).$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.