8
$\begingroup$

I attached a ballpoint pen refill to a DC motor and made it spin very fast. Instead of just turning along its axis, the refill started to wobble around to make a transverse wave. You can see that there is a node located about 10 cm away from the base of the refill. (You can click on the images to see video)

enter image description here

I know that a spinning object tends to spread out its mass away from the axis of rotation. But then, I would expect the tube to bend away from the axis all the way from base to tip. Why would it incline towards the axis instead, near the node and form a wave?


Note that these transverse waves only arise if there is some kind of perturbation. I confirmed this by dipping the spinning refill in a glass of water (which would dampen any vibrations) and found that it spins stably along its axis.enter image description here

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ if you repeat the experiment with a different refill (say an empty one), does the node appear at the same point? $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2020 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ @SuperfastJellyfish I'll check... $\endgroup$
    – AlphaLife
    Mar 27, 2020 at 8:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Superfast Jellyfish No, I tried with a different refill and the node appears 1 cm farther away. imgur.com/siBVlUw $\endgroup$
    – AlphaLife
    Mar 27, 2020 at 8:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wonder if it is the same effect as this: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/22268/… with your refill acting as a stiff kind of rope. $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2020 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ @KrishnanandJ: Were you able to see this with your own eyes? If not, this might be due to the rolling shutter effect. $\endgroup$
    – Vishnu
    Mar 28, 2020 at 7:15

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Consider a coordinate system with the $x$-axis parallel to the initial position of the rod and let $y(x)$ describe the shape of the spinning rod.

The potential energy of a small piece of the spinning rod is the sum of the elastic energy, $\frac{\kappa y''^2}{2} dx$ (here we assume that $y' \approx 0$) and the energy due to centripetal force $\frac{-\rho \omega^2 y^2}{2}dx$, where $\rho$ is the linear density and $\kappa$ characterises the stiffness of the rod (Young's modulus multiplied by the cross-section area of the rod). Thus $$U = \int_0^L \frac{\kappa y''^2}{2} - \frac{\rho \omega^2 y^2}{2}dx$$ where $L$ is the length of the rod.

In a stable position we must have $\delta U=0$

Also we have $y(0) = 0$

The extremum can be found by calculus of variations - the solution will be $$y(x) = Ash(ax) + Bsin(ax)$$ where $a = (\frac{\omega ^ 2 \rho}{\kappa})^\frac{1}{4}$ and $A, B$ are solutions of a linear system $$\begin{cases} Ash(aL) - Bsin(aL) = 0 \\ Ach(aL) - Bcos(aL) = 0 \end{cases}$$ If $B$ was zero, we would indeed have bent all the way to the tip without the node in a hyperbolic shape. But it is due to this additional $Bsin(ax)$ term that we have a node. Indeed, if your pen was longer, I would say you might have been able to observe multiple nodes, the position of the nodes, $x_n$, given by the equation $$y(x_n) = Ash(ax_n) + Bsin(ax_n) = 0$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You have a mistake in the compuationt - only $sinh(x), cosh(x)$ linear combinations are solutions. The wave-like shape seems to correspond to the $cosh(x)$ part, given that the boundary condition cannot be enforced perfectly. $\endgroup$
    – Void
    Mar 28, 2020 at 10:03
  • $\begingroup$ The equation I got was $\kappa y'''' - \rho \omega ^ 2 y = 0$. $sin(ax)$ and $cos(ax)$ satisfy it. The equation you will get with Lagrangian similar to the one I have, you will get a 4-th order ODE, so a general solution will be a linear combination of 4 functions. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2020 at 10:13
1
$\begingroup$

My guess is that at high rotation speeds any small defect of excentricity of your refill will generate a rotating force due to rotation unbalance. This force may in turn excite a fundamental flexural mode of your refill with a clamped and a free edge condition. The mode shape (in particular, the position of the nodes) should then depend on the rotation speed. Maybe you could test this hypothesis.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.