4
$\begingroup$

I have hamiltonian for fermionic field as $${\cal H}_F=E_0+\int dx[\frac{v}{2}(\Psi^\dagger\frac{\partial \Psi^\dagger}{\partial x}-\Psi\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x})+\Delta\Psi^\dagger\Psi]\tag{1}$$ And partition function is

$$\mathcal{Z}=Tre^{-\frac{H_F}{T}}=\int D\Psi D\Psi^{\dagger}e^{-\int_0^{1/T}dx^0 dx^1\mathcal{L}}. \tag{2}$$

And

$$\mathcal{L}=\frac{-\dot\iota}{2}\Big(\Psi^\dagger\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x^0}+\Psi\frac{\partial\Psi^\dagger}{\partial x^0}+\Psi^\dagger\frac{\partial\Psi^\dagger}{\partial x^1}-\Psi\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x^1}\Big)$$

The text says, by using Grassmann variables, one can write the partition function given above. I read about Grassmann variable (Grassmann Algebra), but still, I don't know how to write the partition function given above.

We get Hamiltonian above after Jordan-Winger and Bogoliubov transformation of the quantum Ising model in a transverse field.

Text also talks about Majorana fermions. How to relate above field as Majorana field fermion?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think it means that you have to interpret $\Psi$ and $\Psi^\dagger$ as grassmann variables in the integral formulation of $\mathcal{Z}$. $\endgroup$ Mar 24, 2020 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Raskolnikov I tried, but couldn't solve RHS of equation (2) to verify that it is indeed partition function. $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2020 at 16:51

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

As you can see the action is a sesquilinear form in $\Phi, \Phi^\dagger$. This means that you can write

$$ S = \Phi^\dagger G \Phi. $$

Now you realize that the partition function is a gaussian (infinite dimensional) integral over Grassmann variables, i.e.

$$ Z = \int D\Phi D\Phi^\dagger e^{- \Phi^\dagger G \Phi }. $$

The formula for Gaussian integral over Grassmann variables is similar to the one for complex variables with an additional (-1).

The formula reads

$$ Z = \det(G). $$

The problem is reduced to the computation of that (infinite dimensional) determinant.

Note In the post there is some confusion about naming the fields $\Phi$ vs $\Psi$. Also the Hamiltonian has a mass term $\Delta$ which is absent in the Lagrangian.

Edit 04/06/2020

I overlooked one important detail. The Hamiltonian (and Lagrangian) contains pair creation terms $\Psi^\dagger \partial_x \Psi^\dagger$ (and the corresponding pair annihilation). In this case in order to write the action as a quadratic form you must first pass to so called Nambu spinor:

$$ \Phi = \left ( \begin{array}{cc} \Psi \\ \Psi^\dagger \end{array} \right ), $$

taking care of anticommutation relations.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry. I have rectified mass term in Langrangian. Any way you can show for $\Delta=0$ because for Majorana fermions are massless. IDK know how to write action as a matrix $G$? Perhaps, a hint would be enough. $\endgroup$ Mar 28, 2020 at 3:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.