I'm a little confused regarding why the cathode electrode of a voltaic battery is denoted as being a positive terminal. Does the positive denote holding a positive charge?
Here is what (I think) I know to be true:
The anode (where oxidation occurs) is a source of electrons and the cathode (where reduction occurs) is a sink of electrons
Charge moves in the direction of the electric field lines
The net charge of the voltaic battery system is zero
the electrolyte solutions that bathe the anode electrode and cathode electrode are electrically neutral
For electrons to move from the anode electrode to the cathode electrode, there is clearly some force driving them there. The only thing I can think of that mechanistically explains this is that, even in a closed circuit, there must be some sort of negative charge accumulation at the anode electrode (i.e. the anode holds, albeit small, a static negative charge).
Because the electrolyte solutions remain electrically neutral (ensured by a salt bridge), I can't see why positive charge would be present at the cathode electrode. The only thing I could understand is that the cathode electrode does not accumulate as much negative charge as the anode electrode. In such a case, it's not that the cathode electrode is positively charged...it's just that it is less negatively charged than the anode electrode. In this scenario, electrons would certainly flow to the cathode from the anode.
However, in order for this to be true, it must be the case that the electrolyte solutions actually carry a small positive charge (to counterbalance the negative charges that are held at both the anode and cathode electrodes)...which would contradict statement 4. Not sure how to reconcile this...
So, really, the reason we call a cathode in a voltaic battery a "positive terminal" is actually just because it is less negative than the anode (even thought it doesn't actually retain some net positive charge).
Is this correct?