1
$\begingroup$

Related to this answer to a question about the speed of an accelerating car, I'm looking for a formula for the speed of a car decelerating in neutral (with the transmission disengaged, i.e. no torque, either positive or negative, from the engine.) Although similar to the modeling made in that answer, the constant $A$ should be negative since there is no torque from the engine. Assuming $c_r$ is the constant related to the rolling resistance force and $c_{drag}$ that due to aerodynamic drag, we can write

$$ \frac{dv}{dt} = -c_r - c_{drag} v^2 $$

This can be rewritten as

$$ \frac{dv}{-c_r - c_{drag} v^2} = dt $$

Solving this without taking integration constants into account, I found

$$ v = \sqrt{\frac{c_r}{c_{drag}}} \tan \left( -\sqrt{c_r c_{cdrag}} t \right) $$

Although there is a problem with this formula in that $c_r = 0$ when $v = 0$, which is not captured by the formula, in my case I don't really consider it an issue as I'm interested in the deceleration curve between two different speeds, both greater than zero.

The real issue for me is that I haven't been able to properly fit an integration constant to this, so that I start with a certain desired speed $v_0$ at $t = 0$. My first thought was to add $v_0$ as an integration constant after solving the left-hand side of the second equation above. This gives:

$$ v = \sqrt{\frac{c_r}{c_{drag}}} \tan\left(-\sqrt{c_r c_{drag}} (t - v_0)\right), $$

but when I replaced some reasonable values for $c_r$ and $c_{drag}$ (which actually worked fine in the acceleration case), and taking $v_0 = 30$, the initial speed was over 350 m/s, which makes no sense.

So how do I correctly add integration constants to the solution above, so that I get a correct answer for the desired $v_0$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ One thing you should note above $(t - v_0)$ is nonsensical because the units are incapable with addition (that is of it refers to a velocity and not a time). $\endgroup$ – Triatticus Mar 16 at 6:52
0
$\begingroup$

While writing the question, it dawned on me how to correctly proceed. Consider again the second equation:

$$ \frac{dv}{-c_r - c_{drag} v^2} = dt. $$

Solving the integral, we get

$$ - \frac{\tan^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{c_{drag}}{c_r}} v \right)}{\sqrt{c_r c_{drag}}} + c = t, $$

where without loss of generality a single integration constant was considered.

The point I was missing is that I know $v(t = 0) = v_0$. Therefore, I need to find the value of $c$ in this equation that ensures $v = v_0$ when $t = 0$. Replacing these values into the equation, I get the following:

$$ c = \frac{\tan^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{c_{drag}}{c_r}} v_0 \right)}{\sqrt{c_r c_{drag}}}. $$

So, the actual equation for deceleration, assuming $v(t = 0) = v_0$, should be:

$$ v = \sqrt{\frac{c_r}{c_{drag}}} \tan\left(-\sqrt{c_r c_{drag}} \left( t - \left( \frac{\tan^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{c_{drag}}{c_r}} v_0 \right)}{\sqrt{c_r c_{drag}}} \right) \right) \right). $$

This is now giving reasonable values, except, as stated in the question, when $v$ reaches zero, where friction should subside. However, this is to be expected as the vanishing friction is not modeled.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.