0
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to solve an exercise which should be easy but I'm very rusty and I don't really know how to do it.

The exercise is the first one in this link, I have problems with the point 3 of this exercise. I'll present here a short summary of what one need to know to help me, and my attempt

Consider the following Friedmann and continuity equation

$$ H^2=8 \pi G \rho_T -\frac{k}{a^2} $$ $$ \dot{\rho}_T= - 3 H (\rho_T+p_T) $$

The possibility for the equation of state are 2:

matter: $p_m=0$

some fluid with negative pressure: $p_s=\gamma\rho_s$ with $-1\leq \gamma \leq -1/3$

After asking to find the evolution of the energy densities in the case only one of them was present, and after asking to derive the equation for $\ddot{a}$ (and both can be used for the next points) the exercise says

Having defined $\Omega_i(a)=\rho_i(a)/\rho_{cr}(a)$, $\rho_{cr}=3H^2(a)/(8\pi G)$ for $i=(m,s)$ and $1 + z = 1/a$, find an expression for the parameter $\Omega_{m,0}=\Omega_m(a=1)$ as a function of the two following quantities only:

1) $z_\star$, the redshift at which the condition $\dot{a} = \ddot{a}=0$ is satisfied (the relation between redshift and scale factor is $1 + z = 1/a$);

2) $n = 3 + 3\gamma$.

My (wrong) attempt: from the Friedmann equation and from the fact that for a general equation of state $p=w \rho$ we have $\rho \propto a^{-3(1+w)}$ I can obtain

$$ \Omega_{m,0} = (1+z)^3(1-\Omega_k) - (1+z)^{3-n} \Omega_{s,0} $$

only as a function of $n$ and not as a function of $z_\star$

So now I have basically 2 questions:

1) Can you help me solve the exercise?

2) Simultaneously with (1) can you explain a bit the physical meaning of $z_\star$ since I have never encoutered, I mean it is a redshift at which the Hubble factor is zero (since $\dot{a}=0$), what does it mean?

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please link/quote where you found this exercise? $\endgroup$ – magma Mar 4 '20 at 1:16
  • $\begingroup$ @magma It's an old exercise in an admission test for the PhD in trieste. I have it on my pc I think I can find it from their site $\endgroup$ – AnOrAn Mar 4 '20 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ Should we assume $\kappa=0$ ? $\endgroup$ – Layla Mar 5 '20 at 10:20
  • $\begingroup$ I am thinking that we can use $q=(\Omega_i(1+3w_i))/2$. But I am not exactly sure what should we get. $\dot{a}$ means that the expansion of the umiverse pauses at that instant. $\endgroup$ – Layla Mar 5 '20 at 10:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Reign Hi, I edited the question with a link to the full exercise $\endgroup$ – AnOrAn Mar 5 '20 at 21:06
1
$\begingroup$

Let me share my solution.

So by using Friedmann equation we can write,

$$H^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}(\rho_m + \rho_s) - \frac{k}{a^2}$$

since we are looking for $a_{*}$ such that, $\dot{a}=\ddot{a}=0$, we can set $H=0$.

$$\frac{8\pi G}{3}(\rho_m + \rho_s) = \frac{k}{a_{*}^2}$$

or

$$\frac{8\pi G}{3}(\rho_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3} + \rho_{s,0}a_{*}^{-3(1+\gamma)}) = \frac{k}{a_{*}^2}$$

Let us divide it by $\rho_{crit,0}=\frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G}$

$$\frac{8\pi G}{3}(\Omega_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3} + \Omega_{s,0}a_{*}^{-3(1+\gamma)}) = \frac{k8\pi G}{a_{*}^23H_0^2}$$

Hence,

$$(\Omega_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3} + \Omega_{s,0}a_{*}^{-3(1+\gamma)}) = \frac{k}{a_{*}^2H_0^2}~~(1)$$

Now let us look the acceleration equation

$$\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3}(\rho_m + \rho_s(1+3\gamma))$$

Set $\ddot{a}=0$ for $a_{*}$. So we can write

$$\rho_m = -\rho_s(1+3\gamma)$$

or

$$\Omega_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3}=-\Omega_{s,0}a_{*}^{-3(1+\gamma)}(1+3\gamma)$$ $$\Omega_{m,0}=-\Omega_{s,0}a_{*}^{-3\gamma}(1+3\gamma)~~(2)$$

Inserting (2) in (1)

$$\Omega_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3}-\frac{\Omega_{m,0}}{(1+3\gamma)a_{*}^{-3\gamma}}a_{*}^{-3(1+\gamma)} = \frac{k}{a_{*}^2H_0^2}$$

$$\Omega_{m,0}a_{*}^{-3}[1-\frac{1}{1+3\gamma}] = \frac{k}{a_{*}^2H_0^2}$$

$$\Omega_{m,0} = a_{*}\frac{k}{H_0}\frac{1+3\gamma}{3\gamma}$$ $$\Omega_{m,0} = (1+z_{*})^{-1}\frac{k}{H_0}\frac{n-2}{n-3}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, sorry for my late answer. I think this solution is ok and I'd check it. But can you expand a bit on the meaning of $dot{a}=\ddot{a}=0$? $\endgroup$ – AnOrAn Mar 9 '20 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ @AnOrAn Hey, hmm I mean what kind of meaning are you referring to ? It represents that the expansion of the universe stops. I am not sure what else we can say $\endgroup$ – Layla Mar 9 '20 at 18:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.