0
$\begingroup$

I am following Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, as well as an online lecture that follows a different book, and both sources give different equations for the general solution of the 1-D Schrodinger equation for a free particle.

Griffiths has it as: $$\Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\phi(k) e^{ i\left(kx-\frac{hk^2}{2m}t\right)}dk\tag1$$

The online lecture has it as:$$\Psi(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt {2\pi\hbar}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}a(p) e^{ \frac{i}{\hbar}\left(px-\frac{p^2}{2m}t\right)}dp\tag2$$

The most glaring addition to the second equation is the $\hbar$ under the square root sign. Given this, I can't see how they're both equivalent.

The link to the online lecture is http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xm-LMpkqSUQ#t=1273s

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Consider making the substitution $k = p/\hbar$ in the first expression, while simultaneously defining $$ \sqrt{\hbar} \,a(p) = \phi(k) $$ then the first integral will become $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \sqrt{\hbar}\, a(p) e^{i\left(\frac{p}{\hbar} x - \frac{\hbar}{2m}\frac{p^2}{\hbar^2}t\right)} \frac{dp}{\hbar} $$ which is exactly the second integral. It's just a change of notation!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.