I know that $\vec{v}=wr\hat{\theta}$ in uniform circular motion. This equation looks like a result of a cross product.

Yesterday, I started to learn Basic Dynamics of Rigid Bodies. My teacher wrote $\vec{v}=\vec{\omega}\times\vec{r}$ in the lecture. But I have never seen this. This equation also equals to $\vec{v}={\omega}{r}\sin(\vec{\omega},\vec{r})\hat{?}$ If $\sin(\vec{\omega},\vec{r})$ equals to $\sin(\pi/2)$ then the equation equals to $\vec{v}={\omega}{r}\hat{?}$

I wonder that how the unit vector $\hat{?}$ is equal to $\hat{\theta}$. When I try to figure it out, I can't. Can you explain it, please?

  • $\begingroup$ A2A @ACuriousMind $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ what does 𝜃̂ mean in your first formula, since the formula of your teacher is the usual one. the next equations apply only to the absolut value of v not to the vector . $\endgroup$
    – trula
    Feb 26 '20 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ @trula Sorry, I don't understand. $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 14:40

Your first equation works when you have already isolated the plane of rotation. It treats $\omega$ as a scalar. Sometimes we can't isolate it into a 2d case like this, such as if there are angular accelerations or other considerations. To handle the full 3d case, we define rotation using a vector, $\vec{\omega}$. This vector is defined to have a magnitude equal to the $\omega$ from the first equation, and a direction which is is at right angles to the rotation.

Now, if you're a purist, that cross product might bug you. In these cases, we're not actually using the cross product of two vectors, but the product of a bivector, which is easier to trace down to why it is the correct tool to use. It just so happens that in 3 dimensions, the math for cross products and bivectors is identical, and historically we've found teaching cross products easier than introducing bivectors.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your detailed answer, sir. Does the magnitude of rotation vector $\vec{\omega}$ equals to angular velocity $\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}$? $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 15:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ICCQBE Yes, it will. In fact, if you take a simple rotation in the x-y plane, where $\vec\omega$ is in the z direction, and crunch the numbers for the cross product, you'll end up with the 2d equations you are used to. It's a good simple test case to see how the cross product works its magic. $\endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    Feb 26 '20 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ Alright! Thanks :) $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean bivector in the geometric/clifford algebra sense? $\endgroup$
    – roshoka
    Feb 26 '20 at 18:27
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, no. I didn't mean it. I just heard it first time. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 20:22

you can write any vector with his magnitude and unity direction

$$\vec{v}=|\vec{v}|\,\vec{n}\tag 1$$


$|\vec{v}|=|\vec{\omega}|\,|\vec{r}|\,\sin(\theta) $

where $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec{\omega}$ and $\vec{r}$

thus equation (1)


where the vector n is perpendicular to the vector omega and r

$\vec{n}\perp\vec{\omega}\quad ,\vec{n}\perp\vec{r}$ with $||\vec{n}||=1$

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your explanation. $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '20 at 20:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.