2
$\begingroup$

Please understand, I am not a scientist. My understanding of "nothing" is that virtual particles are constantly springing into existence on borrowed time and borrowed energy. Almost instantly annihilating each other giving back that borrowed energy.

But could an event happen such as 2 antimatter particles appearing near enough to each other to repel each away from their normal matter virtual particle, thereby stopping the annihilation from happening?

Is there any mechanism that would prevent virtual particles from annihilating each other? If so, what? If not, why?

Thanks

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Virtual particles are a mathematical term, which appeared in the language of physics in the crossection and decay calculations using Feynman diagrams .

These diagrams are a pictorial representation of integrals to be carried out over the limits of the particular study. For example the following diagram

virtual

allows to write the exact integral for the first term in the pertubation mathematical series for the crossection of two electrons interacting.

The line is called a virtual photon, because it has the quantum numbers of a photon but its mass is off shell, ( the four vector of a virtual particle is off mass shell) can vary within the bounds of the integration so it is not a real particel, just a place holder for the quantum numbers mathematics.

The trouble that gives the misconception you have in your questions start when higher order diagrams in the pertubation series are calculated , to increase the accuracy of the prediction. Such diagrams have loop corrections some from the vacuum

loops

Furry-picture Feynman diagrams depicting the one-loop QED corrections to the bound-muon g factor: (a) the electric and (b) magnetic loop vacuum polarization corrections, and (c) the selfenergy wave function and (d) self-energy vertex correction terms. A double external line represents a muonic Coulomb-Dirac wave function, and the wave line terminated by a triangle stands for the interaction with the external magnetic field. An internal wave line represents a photon propagator, and an internal double line depicts a Coulomb-Dirac muon propagator; in vacuum polarization loops, it may also represent an electron-positron propagator.

These diagrams are added to internal lines (i.e. virtual, off mass shell) in the first order feyinman diagrams to generate the diagrams that will give corrections to the first order calculation.The missuse of vacuum polarization comes from the naive supposition that these loops exist intependent of input particle and output particle energy and momentum, real particles on mass shell.

For a diagram to have a breaking virtual loop giving real on mass shell particles coming out, taking energy and momentum from the initial incoming real particles , a new diagram will need to be calculated with more outgoing real particles.

Energy is always conserved.

To come to Hawking radiation which is illustrated by breaking virtual loops, a correct feynman diagram representation should include the virtual exchange of a graviton with the black hole's gravitational field, and that is why hawking radiation diminshes the black hole. Real energy has to be fed for a virtual loop to stop being a mathematical construct and break into two real particles with on mass shell four vectors.

To your questions

But could an event happen such as 2 antimatter particles appearing near enough to each other to repel each away from their normal matter virtual particle, thereby stopping the annihilation from happening?

The annihilation is virtual, within an integral which means that "near enough" has no meaning, as the variables of the integration are continuous. What you describe would need different diagrams showing vertices with interactions between loops ( a much higher order diagram than shown above) but the effect would be in the interaction studied between real incoming and outgoing particles, with their four vectors on mass shell.

Is there any mechanism that would prevent virtual particles from annihilating each other? If so, what? If not, why?

One can imagine the vacuum filled with annihilating virtual loops, but mathematically and for calculational purposes energy has to be supplied from some real on shell particles for the vacuum loops to be more than an imagination.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In short: There is nothing being material or even just physical popping in and out of existence. Is this brutal summary of mine correct? $\endgroup$ – Alchimista Feb 26 at 8:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Alchimista brutally speaking. it is part of a useful mathematical tool. The bottom line is that for a fourvector on mass shell, energy must be supplied $\endgroup$ – anna v Feb 26 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ In the first diagram I point out for op that there are no momentum integrals. The photon is off shell but its momentum is fixed by the sum of the ingoing momenta of the electron and positron. Thus the statement "can vary within the bounds of integration" is incorrect. The next diagram in the perturbative series would involve virtual loops with undetermined momenta which are integrated over but as discussed before at tree level no such integrals arise. Another good example is the Compton amplitude - standard textbooks show there are no momentum integrals over internal electron legs. $\endgroup$ – lux Feb 26 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ @lux are there no space time integrals? Probability of finding the particles at (x,y,z)? I amnot specifying the integrals, only that the line is off mass shell. $\endgroup$ – anna v Feb 26 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ Momentum integrals are done in momentum space, not space time. Transforming back to position space requires an inverse Fourier transform but this has nothing to do with the photon being off mass shall or the "usual" momentum integrals that appear when calculating feynman diagrams at one loop order or above. $\endgroup$ – lux Feb 26 at 15:25
0
$\begingroup$

You should read up on Hawking radiation. Here due to quantum fluctuations a pair of particle-antiparticle is formed near the event horizon. Normally the two would almost immediately annihilate. In the particular case of Hawking radiation, one of the pair falls into the black hole and the other one escapes, thus becoming a 'real' particle. This also causes the BH to slowly lose energy.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Pavel - Here is a dumb question - but don't these particles appear from the quantum foam? Why would the BH lose energy if the particles don't actually come from the BH? $\endgroup$ – Rick Feb 25 at 0:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not sure about quantum foam. Think of it like this: the gravity of the BH supplied the energy that allowed for these particles to pop into existence. When one of them escapes it causes the BH to lose the energy. $\endgroup$ – pavel Feb 25 at 1:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.