I am attempting to prove the following relation

$\frac 1 2$$(\hat X^2 \hat P_x+\hat P_x \hat X^2)$ = $\hat X \hat P_x \hat X$

My attempt: $\hat X=x$ , $\hat P_x=-ih\frac d {dx}$

I commuted the commutator relation: $[\hat X,\hat P_x] = ih$

I'm unsure how I could use the commutator relation here.

Using the given values one should obtain: $\frac 1 2$$(x^2*-ih\frac d {dx}--ih\frac d {dx}*x^2)$ = $x*ih\frac d {dx}*x$

Which seems trivial, and this yields: $\frac 1 2$$(x^2*-ih\frac d {dx}-2xih)$=$-xih$

Which could be written as $\frac 1 2$$(x^2*-ih\frac d {dx})$ = $0$.

I have clearly gone wrong here and I'm not sure where. I should really apply the commutator relation somewhere or perhaps use the argument that $[\hat X^n, \hat P_x]=ihn\hat X^{n-1}$


It's not true that $$-i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} * x^2 = -2i\hbar x$$ That is because $*$ should be understood as multiplication of operators, and not as evaluating one operator on another.

The proper way to calculate this product is to act on some wavefunction:

$$ (\hat P_x \hat X^2 \psi)(x) = -i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} (x^2\psi(x)) = -i\hbar(2x\psi(x) + x^2\frac{d}{dx}\psi(x)) = ((-2i\hbar \hat X + \hat X^2\hat P_x)\psi)(x)$$

Since it works for any function $\psi$, it means that $$ \hat P_x \hat X^2 = -2i\hbar \hat X + \hat X^2\hat P_x $$

Similarly $$ \hat X\hat P_x \hat X = -i\hbar \hat X + \hat X^2\hat P_x $$

It is also possible to prove the desired relation without using any representation of the operators. We have $$ \frac12(\hat X^2 \hat P_x + \hat P_x \hat X^2) - \hat X\hat P_x\hat X = \frac12(\hat X^2 \hat P_x-\hat X\hat P_x\hat X)+\frac12(\hat P_x \hat X^2-\hat X\hat P_x\hat X) = \\ = \frac12 \hat X(\hat X\hat P_x - \hat P_x\hat X) + \frac12(\hat P_x \hat X-\hat X\hat P_x)\hat X =\\ = \frac12 \hat X * i\hbar + \frac12 (-i\hbar) *\hat X = 0$$

  • $\begingroup$ Brilliant, thank you for your explanation. $\endgroup$
    – GavinK14
    Feb 24 '20 at 19:04
  • $\begingroup$ It's not necessary to act on some wavefunction $$ xp_{x}-p_{x}x=i\hbar\:\: \Longrightarrow \left. \begin{cases} x\cdot \:\:\text{(from left)}\\ \cdot x \:\:\text{(from right)} \end{cases}\!\!\right\} \Longrightarrow \left. \begin{cases} x^2p_{x}-xp_{x}x=i\hbar x \\ xp_{x}x-p_{x}x^2=i\hbar x \end{cases}\!\!\right\} \Longrightarrow x^2p_{x}+p_{x}x^2=2xp_{x}x $$ $\endgroup$
    – Frobenius
    Feb 25 '20 at 0:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.