# Is constant acceleration not enough for radiation?

A reference source: Does A Uniformly Accelerating Charge Radiate?

Consider the behavior of a DC current compared to an AC current.

Direct current: has locally fast moving free electrons that progress slowly forward. All the zigzag motion cancels except for a small forward distance covered by a non-cancelled acceleration forward. The progress produces a blip of a magnetic field. The summation of blips forms a uniform magnetic field around the wire. But, electromagnetic radiation is absence.

-Two currents with the same amperes can have different local accelerations. $$V_1 =R_1$$ and $$I_1 = 1 A$$. $$V_2 = R_2$$ and $$I_2 = 1 A$$. $$V_1 > V_2$$ increases the local acceleration for $$I_1$$ over $$I_2$$. $$V_1$$ can be made a high voltage, but still no electromagnetic radiation.

Alternating current: has the same locally fast moving free electrons with the zigzag cancelling motion as direct current. The local acceleration of the direct current can be greater than that of the alternating current. But, now the voltage is constantly changing and the acceleration is constantly changing and electromagnetic radiation is generated.

Experimentally, linear and curved path or orbit radiation occurs. Perhaps the charged particles are locally accelerating and decelerating against each other on a small time scale that produces a blip of electromagnetic radiation which sums to the expected values. This can mean that a single charge under these conditions would be expected not to radiate.

Edit: Adding a possible theory.


A figure of the field lines of a constant accelerating charge from Charge Acceleration and Field-Lines Curvature is Robert Shuler talks about this figure in the thread Is the principle of equivalence, the starting point of general relativity, a correct assumption?:

"You can see that for uniform acceleration, none of the classic features of radiation can be identified. In particular, since no point is clearly distinguishable from another point, no frequency is identifiable. Effectively, the frequency is zero."

A try at a theory: The smooth constant acceleration field lines do not radiate, but store potential energy like a compressed spring. A change in acceleration releases the energy in the form of radiation.

Modifying a derivation from Magnetism, Radiation, and Relativity by Daniel V. Schroeder Chapter 4, p.30. • An interesting answer to this question might extrapolate the phenomenon of bremsstrahlung, usually associated with beams of fast electrons in accelerators, down to the incoherent mostly-thermal electron motion in a low- voltage DC circuit, and explain why that radiation is not generally detectable. – rob Feb 19 '20 at 19:15
• @rob Or the case of vacuum-tube electronics, with kinetic energies of 200 eV or so. – Pieter Feb 19 '20 at 21:24

According to the band theory, the effect of an electric field is to increase the occupied states just above the Fermi level for momentum $$P$$ in one direction.
But after a small increase, scattering processes are always filling back the lower energy spaces of opposite $$P$$, that were left empty due to the polarization of the E-field.
So, there is EM radiation being produced all the time due to electron acceleration $$\frac{\Delta P}{m\Delta t}$$, but in the infrared region. It is the Joule effect.
The difference for AC current is that besides that infrared radiation, there is also the acceleration due to the changing of the average electron momentum in the period of the oscillation: $$\frac{\Delta P_{av}}{mT}$$