# Why is there a link between binding energy per nucleon and fission energy?

"The reason energy is released in fission is because the daughter nuclei have a greater binding energy per nucleon." I just can't get my head around this for some reason. I am in high school physics.

I understand from the graph of binding energy per nucleon against nucleon number that heavier nuclei are more suited for fission but why? How come the total binding energy of heavier atoms, say uranium-235, is greater than that of smaller nuclei? Doesn't electromagnetic repulsion overcome the strong nuclear force at larger distances so wouldn't that make it easier to separate the nucleons? I know that the binding energy of larger nuclei is greater but, again, why?

What my question is in summary: Why is the energy released in fission due to the daughter nuclei having greater binding energy per nucleon?

Binding energy is negative. You have to give the nucleons energy to unbind the nucleus. Think of it like gravitational binding energy (which is also negative for a bound object). The (positive) difference in binding energy when heavy nuclei split is available as heat (or rather, photons and kinetic energy).

The question about why smaller nuclei are more bound (per nucleon), is that they have fewer self-repulsing protons but still a large number of nucleons that feel the strong nuclear force.

Larger nuclei like 235-U have larger (total) binding energies because each added nucleon feels the short-range strong nuclear force just from its near neighbours. Thus to first order, every added nucleon increases the binding energy by the same amount. However, each added nucleon (on average) has less binding energy per nucleon, because proton repulsion works over long ranges and is felt between all protons in the nucleus, not just the near neighbours. This decreases the binding energy by an amount proportional to the square of the number of protons. (And you can't just keep adding only neutrons because they will beta decay into protons).