1
$\begingroup$

I have been given the following proof for the fact that the Moyal bracket is the Wigner-Weyl transform of the quantum commutator. However, I am unsure about the vanishing of some boundary terms in an intermediate step of the proof.

Consider three operators $\hat{A}$, $\hat{B}$, and $\hat{C}$ on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$, related to each other via $$\hat{C}=\hat{A}\hat{B}$$

The Wigner transform to phase space of the above expression is given by the Moyal product $$C_c(x,p_x)=A_c(x,p_x)\star B_c(x,p_x)$$ where the subscript $c$ labels c-number quantities. An integral representation of the above equation is $$C_c(x,p_x)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty db\int_{-\infty}^\infty dc \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\beta}{2\pi}e^{i\alpha b}e^{i\beta c}A_c(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x+\hbar\alpha)B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x+\hbar\beta)$$

To evaluate the integral, we first Taylor expand the integrand as $$A_c(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x+\hbar\alpha)B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x+\hbar\beta)=A_c(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x)B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)+\hbar\left(\underbrace{\alpha B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x)}}_{\text{This!}}+\beta A_c(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x)\left.\frac{\partial B_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)}\right)+\mathcal{O}(\hbar^2)$$

and consider each term individually. For example, the contribution from the first half (which I denoted "This!" in the expression above) of the term linear in $\hbar$, is \begin{align}\hbar\int_{-\infty}^\infty db\int_{-\infty}^\infty dc \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}\alpha e^{i\alpha b}\underbrace{\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\beta}{2\pi}e^{i\beta c}}_{=\delta(c)}B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x+\frac{c}{2},p_x)}=\\=\hbar\int_{-\infty}^\infty db\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}\underbrace{\alpha e^{i\alpha b}}_{=-i\frac{\partial}{\partial b}e^{i\alpha b}}B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x,p_x)}=\end{align}

At this point, integration by parts is performed to give \begin{split}=i\hbar\int_{-\infty}^\infty db\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}e^{i\alpha b}\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x,p_x)}\underbrace{\left.\frac{\partial B_c}{\partial b}\right|_{(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)}}_{=-\frac{1}{2}\left.\frac{\partial B_c}{\partial x}\right|_{(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)}}=\\=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}\int_{-\infty}^\infty db\underbrace{\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{d\alpha}{2\pi}e^{i\alpha b}}_{=\delta(b)}\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x,p_x)}\left.\frac{\partial B_c}{\partial x}\right|_{(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)}=\\=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}\left.\frac{\partial A_c}{\partial p_x}\right|_{(x,p_x)}\left.\frac{\partial B_c}{\partial x}\right|_{(x,p_x)}\end{split}

Acting similarly on the other terms gives the final result, $$C_c(x,p_x)=A_c(x,p_x)B_c(x,p_x)+\frac{i\hbar}{2}\left\{A_c(x,p_x),B_c(x,p_x)\right\}+\mathcal{O}(\hbar^2)$$

My question is: why do the boundary terms in the integration by parts vanish? Specifically to the term examined above, why is it that $$\lim_{t\to\infty}\left[B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)e^{i\alpha b}\right]_{b=-t}^{b=t}=0\quad?$$

I overheard someone saying that the answer lies in the integration contour considered, but I couldn't really hear the answer in full.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Cool? One gathers so. . $\endgroup$ – Cosmas Zachos Feb 18 at 14:25
2
$\begingroup$

Specifically to the term examined above, why is it that $$\lim_{t\to\infty}\left[B_c(x-\frac{b}{2},p_x)e^{i\alpha b}\right]_{b=-t}^{b=t}=0\quad?$$

Crudely, because for any x you may take a $t\gg 2x$, and all these phase space functions are taken to vanish at infinity in Wigner map physics applications.

Consider a phase-space Gaussian $B(x,p)\propto \exp (-(x^2+p^2)/a) $. The rapid oscillations of the phase factor $e^{\pm i\alpha t}$ are not terribly stable either: in QM they are routinely the mark of 0.

Personally, if this were a physics course, I would not perorate on contours.

By the way, your expansion merely illuminates the small ℏ behavior of the Moyal Bracket moored by the Poisson bracket; it does not prove anything about Groenewold's fundamental theorem of phase-space QM. The quantum world starts with the higher-order terms you elided.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.