The first part of my question is meant to confirm my understanding of length contraction in the context of the following simple thought experiment:
Imagine three particles O(the observer), A and B in a one dimensional space. Initially, they are all stationary with respect to each other. Let the distance between the particle A and B, as observed by O (and consequently, as observed by A or B) be $L$.
- Now let's imagine that the particle O starts to move with the velocity $v$. In the observer O's frame of reference, the distance between A and B should now be measured as $L$$\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$. The distance between A and B as observed by A and B should of course still be $L$.
- Now let's imagine the observer O is stationary, as in the initial setup, and at a certain time instant $t$ in the observer O's frame of reference, both particles A and B start moving from rest with the velocity $v$ at once. My understanding leads me to conclude that distance between A and B as measured by observer O is still $L$. After all, two uniformly accelerating point objects in observer's frame of reference can not come closer to each other. The distance between A and B, as observed by A or B, Would be $L$$\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$, wouldn't it? (Please confirm).
This leads us to the second part of the question. The particles A and B were unconnected in the above example, which is why the distance between A and B as measured by O remained $L$. What if the particles were connected?
Common explanations on the internet propound that an object (which may be approximated as a collection of some point particles bound by some force that maintains the distance between them) that begins to accelerate in a frame of reference will be seen by the observer to contract in its length.
What is the reason that the 'observed distance' between two connected particles may undergo length contraction, but the 'observed distance' between two unconnected particles may remain the same?