# Moving a projectile without recoil?

I was thinking that if you have a shaft pushing a projectile you would have to have some sort of recoil along the shaft. Newton's 3rd law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. However, I came up with a thought experiment which doesn't appear to have any recoil.

Imagine a shaft in space, so no gravity, no air. In the shaft there are vents along its wall that can emit particles perpendicular to the shaft's wall. The projectile is at rest and then particles from the vents are emitted in a sequential order and with symmetric force on all sides of the projectile such that they hit an area on the projectile that deflects the particles downward. This would impart momentum on the projectile to go "up". Yet, there is no recoil, no backward force on the shaft. The shaft doesn't move, only the emitted particles. Here's an example image: Now my question is, does this make sense? Is there something that I'm missing? I'm finding it difficult to believe that one can move a projectile without imparting any net force on the thing that is causing the movement. Can this be done with a field? Like magnetism? Or other mechanism?

• If you consider the high-velocity particles are causing the movement (rather than the shaft), does that make any difference in your question? – BowlOfRed Feb 3 '20 at 22:49
• @BowlOfRed, I was wondering if maybe some other means other than particles can also push a projectile forward without recoil, like magnetism. But I don't think that's the case. – Adrian Feb 3 '20 at 22:51
• While the shaft itself might not move up and down, it is now subjected to forces causing it's expansion away from the acis – Triatticus Feb 3 '20 at 23:43
• Much of the KE would be wasted accelerating the particles backwards – Adrian Howard Feb 4 '20 at 0:21
• @Triatticus acis? – Adrian Feb 4 '20 at 6:06