Consider the two-point function $$ \langle\mathcal{O}_1(x_1)\mathcal{O}_2(x_2)\rangle=f(x_1,x_2) $$ If the operators are in a CFT, we can constrain this function using the symmetries of the theory. Using translational symmetries and the symmetries of the Lorentz group we have $$ f(x_1,x_2) = f(X_{12}) $$ where $X_{12} := (x_1-x_2) $

When we impose dilatation symmetry we get $$ \langle\mathcal{O}_1(x_1)\mathcal{O}_2(x_2)\rangle=\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1+\Delta_2}} $$ where $\Delta_1,\Delta_2$ the dilatation weights of the operators.

Now if we impose special conformal symmetries we have$$ \left(-2x_{1\mu}\Delta_1-2x_{2\mu}\Delta_2+k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu}\right)\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1+\Delta_2}}=0 $$ If we make use of $$ (k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu})|x_1-x_2|=-(x_{1\mu}+x_{2\mu})|x_1-x_2| $$ we should be able to derive $$ \langle\mathcal{O}_1(x_1)\mathcal{O}_2(x_2)\rangle=\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{2\Delta}} $$ for $\Delta_1=\Delta_2=\Delta$ and $0$ otherwise.

I can't derive the final equation from the given identity of $k$'s, is there something else that I'm missing?

Edit:$$ k_\mu=x^2\partial_\mu-2x_\mu x^\nu\partial_\nu $$ The operator associated to special conformal transformations.

  • $\begingroup$ Where exactly is the problem? Did you compute the action of $k_{1\mu}$ and $k_{2\mu}$ on $C_{12}/|x_1 - x_2|^{\Delta_1 + \Delta_2}$? It should be pretty straightforward after that... $\endgroup$
    – M.Jo
    Feb 3 '20 at 11:29
  • $\begingroup$ Could you show that explicitly in an answer? I want to see explicitly the calculations that lead to the correlation being zero for $\Delta_1\ne\Delta_2$ $\endgroup$ Feb 4 '20 at 7:41

You did all the work but just missed the last step:

As you wrote, from the definition of $k_\mu$ you have $$ (k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu})|x_1-x_2|=-(x_{1\mu}+x_{2\mu})|x_1-x_2|, $$ and so $$ (k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu})\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1 + \Delta_2}} = (\Delta_1 + \Delta_2) (x_{1\mu}+x_{2\mu}) \frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1 + \Delta_2}} $$ This means that the constraint from special conformal symmetry becomes $$ \left(-2x_{1\mu}\Delta_1-2x_{2\mu}\Delta_2+k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu}\right)\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1+\Delta_2}} = (\Delta_2 - \Delta_1) (x_{1\mu} - x_{2\mu})\frac{C_{12}}{|x_1-x_2|^{\Delta_1+\Delta_2}} =0. $$ The only way the last equality can be valid for all points $x_1$ and $x_2$ is that $\Delta_1 = \Delta_2$. Now you call this $\Delta$ and you have your result...

  • $\begingroup$ I don't see how your last step follows. I think I'm not sure how $(k_{1\mu}+k_{2\mu})$ acts on $|x_1-x_2|^{-(\Delta_1+\Delta_2)}$ $\endgroup$ Feb 4 '20 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ $k_\mu$ is a simple differential operator, so the chain rule applies, $\partial_\mu |x_1 - x_2|^\alpha = \alpha |x_1 - x_2|^{\alpha - 1} \partial_\mu |x_1 - x_2|$ $\endgroup$
    – M.Jo
    Feb 4 '20 at 12:12
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Feb 4 '20 at 12:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.